From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
To: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>,
list linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: feature re-quest for "re-write"
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:11:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530AAA55.2080508@fnarfbargle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530AA460.602@eyal.emu.id.au>
On 24/02/14 09:46, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> In my case (see earlier thread "raid check does not..." the pending
> sector is early
> in the device, in sector 261696 of a 4TB component (whole space in one
> partition of
> each component). So yes, inside the data area.
>
> I still have it reported in my daily logwatch, any idea what to try?
>
Yes, can you run a dd of the md device from well before to well after
the theoretical position of the error?
If the dd passes cleanly, it indicates the bad block is a parity block
rather than a data block. That hopefully will help narrow down the scope
of the search.
Brad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-21 18:09 feature re-quest for "re-write" Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-02-24 1:30 ` Brad Campbell
2014-02-24 1:46 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-24 2:11 ` Brad Campbell [this message]
2014-02-24 3:40 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-24 14:14 ` Wilson Jonathan
2014-02-24 20:39 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-25 3:16 ` NeilBrown
2014-02-25 5:58 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-25 7:05 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-02-25 7:45 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-25 7:58 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-25 8:35 ` NeilBrown
2014-02-25 11:08 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-25 11:28 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-02-25 12:05 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-25 12:17 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-02-25 12:32 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2014-02-24 2:42 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-02-24 2:24 ` Brad Campbell
2014-02-25 2:10 ` NeilBrown
2014-02-25 2:26 ` Brad Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530AAA55.2080508@fnarfbargle.com \
--to=lists2009@fnarfbargle.com \
--cc=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).