Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
To: Scott D'Vileskis <sdvileskis@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid stalls during --replace and other disk activity...
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:59:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5324BF41.3060401@turmel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK_KU4bZnVSPR+mF3AX_sjQjTdnMonP9x+v84g9SEAN5Necr5g@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/15/2014 03:53 PM, Scott D'Vileskis wrote:
>>
>> This is deliberate, and in my opinion, desirable.  Same thing happens
>> when doing a check or any kind of rebuild on multiple arrays that use
>> partitions on shared underlying devices.  If you don't limit the raid
>> background activity, the extra seek load on the devices can severely cut
>> performance, especially on spinning rust.
>>
> 
> If I was doing a 'normal' resync, I would also agree.
> 
> But my point was this...
> My raid was doing a --replace of /dev/sdf1 with /dev/sde1
> It was only reading/writing from/to those two devices, not the other
> disks in the raid. (i.e. /dev/sd[a-d] were not being used)
> The other job I started (dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda2 bs=1M) was only
> writing to /dev/sda
> 
> These jobs should be are perfectly capable of running in parallel
> without slowing eachother down.

Good point.  If I were Neil, I'd say "Patch Welcome!".  :-)

> I think the logic that pauses a resync on 'related' disk activity
> should treat a --replace slightly different

But I would insist that the solution be generic -- make the existing
logic notice that the activity is on unrelated members, so all
background activity would benefit from the new algorithm.  IMHO.

Phil


      reply	other threads:[~2014-03-15 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-15  4:28 Raid stalls during --replace and other disk activity Scott D'Vileskis
2014-03-15 19:19 ` Phil Turmel
2014-03-15 19:53   ` Scott D'Vileskis
2014-03-15 20:59     ` Phil Turmel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5324BF41.3060401@turmel.org \
    --to=philip@turmel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdvileskis@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox