From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com
Subject: Re: /sys/block/md126 still exists even after stopping the array
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:23:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54253E9F.4070505@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140926103348.5f5ea568@notabene.brown>
Hello Neil,
On 09/26/2014 02:33 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:12:07 +0200 Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
> wrote:
[...]
>> I tried to find out what could have opened the md device by using fuser,
>> but fuser reports no users.
>
> It is probably a transient open/close.
>
If it's open/close wouldn't the 'close' part make the device disapear ?
>>
>> I took a look to the udev rules which are the one shipped by mdadm 3.3.2
>> but nothing keep the device opened during the remove event.
>>
>> Could you give me some hints here to debug this ?
>
> Modify md_open in drivers/md/md.c to add
> printk("Opened by %s\n", current->comm);
>
> and build a new kernel. That will tell you the name of the process which
> opened the device.
>
I did that I also added a trace in md_release() but strangely no trace
were outputed from there.
Here's the details of what I did:
--- %< ---
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md125 : active raid1 vdc1[1] vdb1[0]
65472 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU]
md126 : active raid1 vdc2[1] vdb2[0]
209536 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
md127 : active raid1 vdb3[0] vdc3[1]
1819584 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
[root@localhost ~]# mdadm --stop --scan
[root@localhost ~]# dmesg | grep md_
[ 1.474207] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.475316] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.492880] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.493201] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.494690] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.499369] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.533566] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.533697] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.554419] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.574451] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.574666] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.574877] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.576822] md_open(): opened by systemd-udevd
[ 1.576895] md_open(): opened by systemd-udevd
[ 1.577029] md_open(): opened by systemd-udevd
[ 1.581850] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.584054] md_open(): opened by systemd-udevd
[ 1.584770] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.585175] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.586328] md_open(): opened by systemd-udevd
[ 1.586933] md_open(): opened by systemd-udevd
[ 1.651265] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.651320] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.651364] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.651437] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.652376] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 1.652452] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.486704] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.489259] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.491000] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.491767] md_open(): opened by systemd-udevd
[ 33.692255] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.692288] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.692606] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.692858] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.692942] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.693237] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.694254] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.694275] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.694373] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.695558] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.695679] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.695855] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[ 33.695894] md_open(): opened by mdadm
[root@localhost ~]# ls /dev/md125
/dev/md125
[root@localhost ~]# fuser /dev/md125
[root@localhost ~]# ps aux | grep "mdadm\|systemd-udevd"
root 366 0.0 0.1 38172 1696 ? Ss 06:04 0:00
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
root 465 0.0 0.0 4964 924 ? Ss 06:04 0:00
/sbin/mdadm --monitor --scan --daemonise --syslog
--pid-file=/run/mdadm/mdadm.pid
[root@localhost ~]# ls -l /proc/366/fd/
total 0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 0 -> /dev/null
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 1 -> /dev/null
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 10 -> socket:[8665]
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 11 -> /etc/udev/hwdb.bin
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 12 -> anon_inode:[eventpoll]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 2 -> /dev/null
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 3 -> socket:[8144]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 4 -> socket:[8103]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 5 -> socket:[8660]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 6 -> /run/udev/queue.bin
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 7 -> anon_inode:inotify
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 8 -> anon_inode:[signalfd]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 9 -> socket:[8664]
[root@localhost ~]# ls -l /proc/465/fd/
total 0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 0 -> /dev/null
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 1 -> /dev/null
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:04 2 -> /dev/null
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:06 4 -> /proc/mdstat
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 26 06:06 5 -> socket:[10038]
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
unused devices: <none>
[root@localhost ~]# ls /sys/block/md125/md/
array_size array_state bitmap/ chunk_size component_size layout
level max_read_errors metadata_version new_dev raid_disks
reshape_direction reshape_position resync_start safe_mode_delay
--- >% ---
So in my understanding, only mdadm and udevd are opening the MD devices
and mdamd was the last to open the device. For some unknown reasons,
md_release() is never called.
This happens with:
- kernel 3.14.19
- mdadm 3.3.2
- systemd 208
Can you see something wrong here ?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-24 15:38 /sys/block/md126 still exists even after stopping the array Francis Moreau
2014-06-25 1:03 ` NeilBrown
2014-06-25 6:59 ` Francis Moreau
2014-07-24 13:40 ` Sebastian Parschauer
2014-07-24 13:51 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2014-09-25 16:12 ` Francis Moreau
2014-09-26 0:33 ` NeilBrown
2014-09-26 10:23 ` Francis Moreau [this message]
2014-09-26 10:44 ` NeilBrown
2014-09-26 11:23 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2014-09-29 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2014-09-26 12:21 ` Francis Moreau
2014-09-26 12:50 ` Francis Moreau
2014-09-29 4:47 ` NeilBrown
2014-09-29 4:37 ` NeilBrown
2014-09-29 8:45 ` Francis Moreau
2014-09-29 21:56 ` NeilBrown
2014-09-30 7:43 ` Francis Moreau
2014-10-07 7:05 ` Francis Moreau
2014-10-07 23:54 ` NeilBrown
2014-10-09 9:40 ` Francis Moreau
2014-10-09 9:55 ` NeilBrown
2014-10-10 19:34 ` Francis Moreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54253E9F.4070505@gmail.com \
--to=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).