linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
To: DeadManMoving <sequel@neofreak.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: failed RAID 5 array
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:04:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54662804.7040005@turmel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415980414.4241.49.camel@lappy.neofreak.org>

On 11/14/2014 10:53 AM, DeadManMoving wrote:
> Hi Phil,

> That is my plan to closely look at devices role to ensure proper order
> in array creation. To avoid any mistake, i was planning to
> use /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc syntax instead of /dev/sd{a,b,c}, it's
> probably the same, is it not?

Yes.  Braces are expanded as given.  Square brackets are expanded in the
order found in the filesystem, not the order given.

> Like said in my original post, i am making duplicate copies of each
> disk, just to be extra safe. I already did it for two disks i have on
> hands. I have ordered and waiting for two other drives to come in. As
> soon as the copies will be done for the two other disks, i will try that
> procedure. I will use the --data-offset parameter as you suggest.

You've provided very good detail in your report, so in your situation I
would proceed with the original drives.  But an extra layer of safety
doesn't hurt.  And you'll have enough drives to switch to raid6 (highly
recommended!) when your array is stable again.

> Thank you so much for your help!

You're welcome.

Phil


  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-14 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-12 15:58 failed RAID 5 array DeadManMoving
2014-11-13 22:56 ` Phil Turmel
2014-11-14 13:19   ` DeadManMoving
2014-11-14 13:42     ` Phil Turmel
2014-11-14 14:08       ` DeadManMoving
2014-11-14 14:52         ` Phil Turmel
2014-11-14 15:53           ` DeadManMoving
2014-11-14 16:04             ` Phil Turmel [this message]
2014-11-15  6:42               ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-11-15 15:03                 ` Phil Turmel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-10 12:31 failed raid " Jim Buttafuoco
2004-09-10 13:03 ` Jim Buttafuoco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54662804.7040005@turmel.org \
    --to=philip@turmel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sequel@neofreak.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).