From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Milan Broz Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8 v2] dm: replace memset by memzero_explicit Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:03:53 +0100 Message-ID: <547CD7B9.5030000@gmail.com> References: <1417367029-32762-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <1417367029-32762-6-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1417367029-32762-6-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Julia Lawall , Alasdair Kergon , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Neil Brown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 11/30/2014 06:03 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > Memset on a local variable may be removed when it is called just before the > variable goes out of scope. Using memzero_explicit defeats this > optimization. A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this > change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) Ack, but I submitted the same patch a week ago.... https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-November/msg00084.html Mike, please could you add this to linux-next tree or you want this to go through Herbert's tree? (I do not think it is good idea for DM patches.) Thanks, Milan > > // > @@ > identifier x; > type T; > @@ > > { > ... when any > T x[...]; > ... when any > when exists > - memset > + memzero_explicit > (x, > -0, > ...) > ... when != x > when strict > } > // > > This change was suggested by Daniel Borkmann > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall > > --- > Daniel Borkmann suggested that these patches could go through Herbert Xu's > cryptodev tree. > > v2: fixed email address > > drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c > index fc93b93..08981be 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c > @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static int crypt_iv_tcw_whitening(struct crypt_config *cc, > for (i = 0; i < ((1 << SECTOR_SHIFT) / 8); i++) > crypto_xor(data + i * 8, buf, 8); > out: > - memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); > + memzero_explicit(buf, sizeof(buf)); > return r; > } > >