From: Abhijit Bhopatkar <abhopatk@cisco.com>
To: Lidong Zhong <lzhong@suse.com>, Goldwyn Rodrigues <RGoldwyn@suse.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Potential race in dlm based messaging md-cluster.c
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 15:14:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5548911B.1080702@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5548FC6C020000E100022FA0@relay2.provo.novell.com>
On 05/05/15 2:52 pm, Lidong Zhong wrote:
>>>> On 5/1/2015 at 02:36 AM, in message <5542763C.90202@cisco.com>, Abhijit
> Bhopatkar <abhopatk@cisco.com> wrote:
>> There is a possibility of a receiver losing out on messages in certain
>> corner conditions. One of the buggy case is if there is are two sender
>> ready with messages to be sent. Sender 1 initially gets the TOKEN lock
>> and proceeds.
>> After initial processing the sender of message 1 _will_ release TOKEN as
>> soon as receiver releases ACK, it does not wait till ACK CR is
>> re-acquired by receiver.
>>
>> To illustrate the problem consider timeline for two senders and one
>> receiver (we will ignore receive part for Sender2 node)
>>
>> Sender1 Sender2 Receiver
>> Get EX on TOKEN Get EX on TOKEN
>> <Granted> <Wait till granted>
>>
>> Get EX on MSG
>> write LVB
>> down MSG to CR
>> Get EX of ACK
>> <wait till granted>
>> BAST for ACK
>> Get CR on MSG
>> read LVB
>> process
>> release ACK
>> AST for ACK
>> down ACK to CR
>> release MSG
>> release TOKEN
>> <granted>
>> Get EX on MSG
>
> I am afraid this corner case could not be achieved ever. Sender2 will be blocked on getting
> EX lock on MSG resource until the receivers release the lock. The receivers' request on
> upconverting CR to EX on MSG should be put into the convert queue before Sender2's
> request being put into the wait queue, because sender2 has to wait until the EX on TOKEN
> is released.
>
Yes my initial though of losing a message is not correct. The EX on message won't be granted
immediately to Sender2 However there is still a deadlock.
Perhaps i am missing something, but according to me nothing prevents Sender2 from acquiring
EX on TOKEN _and_ MESSAGE __before__ up convert from reciever is queued. Consider adding
unusual delay right after ACK is released on receiver. The Sender1 will immediately release
MESSAGE and TOKEN. The receiver is still delayed for whatever reason. Sender2 gets TOKEN grant
and immediately queues EX for MESSAGE (note this is before EX for MESSAGE is queued by receiver).
DLM will (should?) return error for the up convert saying there is deadlock (-EDEADLK ??)
This also assumes BAST on MESSAGE is NOP and receiver does not let go of MESSAGE CR.
Abhijit
> Regards,
> Lidong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAE3Hb8oss1JZ2u7g7OQQgrEtgQ1vbQou04isiS6eEqbS=uzbhw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAE3Hb8qNczD30RrcHFYCR90Jf9QFD-XH=x89MAu4Dpmm80se0A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <554251EA.3000807@suse.com>
[not found] ` <CAE3Hb8pJ=0MB6EX5jVch28gj-gnf0Mp1wyzxBfWjzLf=SuV4sQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-04-30 18:36 ` Potential race in dlm based messaging md-cluster.c Abhijit Bhopatkar
2015-04-30 18:47 ` Abhijit Bhopatkar
2015-04-30 18:51 ` Abhijit Bhopatkar
2015-05-05 9:22 ` Lidong Zhong
2015-05-05 9:44 ` Abhijit Bhopatkar [this message]
2015-05-05 12:10 ` Abhijit Bhopatkar
2015-05-07 2:43 ` Lidong Zhong
2015-05-07 9:14 ` Abhijit Bhopatkar
2015-05-08 5:06 ` Lidong Zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5548911B.1080702@cisco.com \
--to=abhopatk@cisco.com \
--cc=RGoldwyn@suse.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lzhong@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).