From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: adfas asd Subject: RE: A few remaining questions about installing to RAID-10 Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <556491.46402.qm@web38805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20091005145711322.FNMG18886@cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091005145711322.FNMG18886@cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids WAT?! How can I mount an unpartitioned/unformatted array? This is more direct than using a filesystem, although there would be no journalling, right? If I were to mount my small disk for / and the unpartitioned array as /home for example. Seems like journalling/crash recovery is pretty vital. Could not partitioning be recommendable? --- On Mon, 10/5/09, Leslie Rhorer wrote: > Partitions are not needed at all unless your underlying > topology requires > it: > > `mdadm --create --raid-devices=2 --metadata=1.0 --chunk=128 > --level=1 > /dev/md0 /dev/sda /dev/sdb` > > Will work just fine. You can also > use LVM with raw disks. Both > systems simply stitch together storage units provided by > the drive > subsystem, so any block device found in /dev can be > used. Once the array is > assembled, it is not necessary to partition it, either, > again unless your > overlaying topology requires it. On my systems, the > boot drives are > partitioned to allow booting into Windows if necessary, and > usually the swap > is also in a partition on the boot drive, but my arrays are > completely > un-partitioned. > >