From: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>,
Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@aei.mpg.de>
Cc: Michael Munger <michael.munger@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which physical device failed?
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 09:16:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5565C3AA.7020809@turmel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150527172701.1090e525@natsu>
On 05/27/2015 08:27 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2015 14:10:03 +0200
> Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@aei.mpg.de> wrote:
>
>> On 05/27/2015 02:04 PM, Michael Munger wrote:
>>> Or, does the OS have access to serial numbers, etc...?
>>>
>>> I have to guide someone through a drive replacement on the phone, and it
>>> would be great if I could tell them exactly which drive to swap out...
>>
>> If you have direct knowledge, which serial number is where, you could
>> use hdparm -I /dev/sdX or smartctl -a /dev/sdX against the still
>> reachable drives.
>
> If /dev/sdc is still present in the system (even if not responding correctly to
> hdparm or smartctl anymore), you should be able to find its serial number from
> the udev symlink that was registered earlier, by running e.g.:
>
> ls -la /dev/disk/by-id/ | grep sdc$
>
> Serial number is typically the last piece of the ID, after the manufacturer
> name and model number.
>
This is one of the reasons I wrote lsdrv [1], especially after I noticed
that the port sequence it reports is stable for the various ports on
every mobo and sata expansion card I've handled. Per controller, at least.
I save of copy of an lsdrv report for each system I commission so that
there's no ambiguity later.
Phil
[1] https://github.com/pturmel/lsdrv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 12:04 Which physical device failed? Michael Munger
2015-05-27 12:10 ` Carsten Aulbert
2015-05-27 12:27 ` Roman Mamedov
2015-05-27 13:16 ` Phil Turmel [this message]
2015-05-27 14:24 ` Michael Munger
2015-05-27 18:16 ` Wilson, Jonathan
2015-05-27 18:38 ` Phil Turmel
2015-05-28 9:03 ` Wilson, Jonathan
2015-05-27 17:48 ` Wols Lists
2015-05-27 18:02 ` Roman Mamedov
2015-05-27 18:19 ` Can Jeuleers
2015-05-27 18:38 ` Wols Lists
2015-05-27 18:41 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5565C3AA.7020809@turmel.org \
--to=philip@turmel.org \
--cc=Carsten.Aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.munger@gmail.com \
--cc=rm@romanrm.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox