Re: [PATCH 3/3] Safeguard against writing to an active device of another node

[Guoqing Jiang <gqJiang@suse.com>]

Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>   
>> Hi Neil,
>>   
>>     
>>> Probably something like that - yes.  Unfortunately your mailer messed
>>> that up more that usual make it rather difficult to apply.
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> Sorry, it is just for review.
>>   
>>     
>>> I was wondering if we could make it a run-time dependency though .. a
>>> bit like get_cluster_name.  We can still do that later I guess.  I'm
>>> not really sure what is best at the moment.
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> It could be, I am changing it and run some test, then the new version patch
>> will be send.
>>   
>>     
> After change to dynamic load dlm library, if compile mdadm without
> related dlm library,
> then some problems appeared, such as unlock dlm would fail when create
> cluster-md,
> the errno is 52 (EBADE: Invalid exchange).
>
> But, if compile mdadm with previous code, then nothing wrong happened
> whether
> the dlm library is installed or not.
>
>   
Oops, if dlm library is not existed then the dlm code is not even
compiled in previous code,
so it doesn't complain about anything about dlm.

Thanks,
Guoqing