linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: data corruption after rebuild
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:20:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5631626.tuTAQthxQb@bloomfield> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110720162431.5df90f32@notabene.brown>

On Wednesday 20 of July 2011 16:24:31 you wrote:
> My suggestion would be to remove the drive you recently added and then see
> if the data is still corrupted.  It may not help but is probably worth a
> try.

tried that, did not help, probably due to the finished rebuild that "repaired" 
all the parity data

> There was a bug prior to 2.6.32 where RAID6 could sometimes write the wrong
> data when recovering to a spare.  It would only happen if you were accessing
> that data at the same time as it was recovery it, and if you were unlucky.

I was accessing some data (read-mostly), but now the largest undamaged file on 
the filesystem has just under 3MB - that looks a bit suspicious, as the stripe-
width is 6x 512K = 3M

> BTW the monthly scans that you do are primarily for finding sleeping bad
> blocks - blocks that you cannot read.  They do check for inconsistencies in
> the parity but only report them, it doesn't correct them.  This is because
> automatically correcting can cause more problems than it solves.
> 
> When the monthly check reported inconsistencies you "should" have confirmed
> that all the drives seem to be functioning correctly and then run a 'repair'
> pass to fix the parity blocks up.
> 
> As you didn't that bad parity would have created bad data when you
> recovered.

see the last part, at this point I would be perfectly OK with 72 damaged 
blocks, as per the last scan (or even a few hundred, for that matter)


PS: forgot to include maillist


      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-20  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-19 13:55 data corruption after rebuild Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 15:12 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-19 16:18   ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 17:38     ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-19 17:44       ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 16:35   ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 16:48     ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-19 17:05       ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 18:12         ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-20  6:24 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-20  8:20   ` Pavel Herrmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5631626.tuTAQthxQb@bloomfield \
    --to=morpheus.ibis@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).