From: Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: data corruption after rebuild
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:20:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5631626.tuTAQthxQb@bloomfield> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110720162431.5df90f32@notabene.brown>
On Wednesday 20 of July 2011 16:24:31 you wrote:
> My suggestion would be to remove the drive you recently added and then see
> if the data is still corrupted. It may not help but is probably worth a
> try.
tried that, did not help, probably due to the finished rebuild that "repaired"
all the parity data
> There was a bug prior to 2.6.32 where RAID6 could sometimes write the wrong
> data when recovering to a spare. It would only happen if you were accessing
> that data at the same time as it was recovery it, and if you were unlucky.
I was accessing some data (read-mostly), but now the largest undamaged file on
the filesystem has just under 3MB - that looks a bit suspicious, as the stripe-
width is 6x 512K = 3M
> BTW the monthly scans that you do are primarily for finding sleeping bad
> blocks - blocks that you cannot read. They do check for inconsistencies in
> the parity but only report them, it doesn't correct them. This is because
> automatically correcting can cause more problems than it solves.
>
> When the monthly check reported inconsistencies you "should" have confirmed
> that all the drives seem to be functioning correctly and then run a 'repair'
> pass to fix the parity blocks up.
>
> As you didn't that bad parity would have created bad data when you
> recovered.
see the last part, at this point I would be perfectly OK with 72 damaged
blocks, as per the last scan (or even a few hundred, for that matter)
PS: forgot to include maillist
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-20 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 13:55 data corruption after rebuild Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 15:12 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-19 16:18 ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 17:38 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-19 17:44 ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 16:35 ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 16:48 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-19 17:05 ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-19 18:12 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-20 6:24 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-20 8:20 ` Pavel Herrmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5631626.tuTAQthxQb@bloomfield \
--to=morpheus.ibis@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).