From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, neilb@suse.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
keith.busch@intel.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org,
bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, "Garg, Dinesh" <dineshg@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce the request handling for dm-crypt
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 08:26:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5644AFA2.6040201@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151112100422.GM12392@sirena.org.uk>
On 11/12/2015 03:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:20:41PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>> 3. perforamence data
>> It is just a simple dd test result, and will provide the formal report
>> in future. But from the simple test, we can see the improvement.
>
> It's probably also worth pointing out that Qualcomm have been shipping
> an out of tree implementation of this as a separate module in their BSP
> (originally written by Danesh Garg who's on this thread):
>
> https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-dory-3.10-kitkat-wear/drivers/md/dm-req-crypt.c
>
> Android now wants to encrypt phones and tablets by default and have been
> seeing substantial performance hits as a result, we can try to get
> people to share performance data from productionish systems but it might
> be difficult.
Well, shame on them for developing out-of-tree, looks like they are
reaping all the benefits of that.
Guys, we need some numbers, enough with the hand waving. There's no
point discussing this further until we know how much of a difference it
makes to handle X MB chunks instead of Y MB chunks. As was previously
stated, unless there's a _substantial_ performance benefit, this
patchset isn't going anywhere.
If there is a huge benefit, we can look into ways of making it actually
work. That may not even be a request interface, it could just be proper
utilization of plugging for in-dm bio merging.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-11 9:31 [PATCH 0/2] Introduce the request handling for dm-crypt Baolin Wang
2015-11-11 9:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: Introduce BIO_ENDIO_FREE for bio flags Baolin Wang
2015-11-11 17:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-12 4:05 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-11 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] md: dm-crypt: Introduce the request handling for dm-crypt Baolin Wang
2015-11-11 9:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-12 2:15 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-12 9:17 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-12 9:40 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-12 11:06 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-12 11:46 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-12 12:24 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-12 12:51 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-12 12:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-12 15:02 ` Mark Brown
2015-11-13 3:27 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-13 3:25 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-12 12:59 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-13 2:05 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-13 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-13 11:37 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-11 18:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-12 2:36 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-12 9:06 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-12 8:20 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-12 10:04 ` Mark Brown
2015-11-12 15:26 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-11-13 2:07 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-13 11:51 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-02 12:46 ` Baolin Wang
2015-12-02 19:56 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2015-12-03 2:56 ` Baolin Wang
2015-12-03 10:36 ` Baolin Wang
2015-12-03 11:07 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2015-12-03 11:27 ` Baolin Wang
2015-12-03 15:49 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-12-04 4:58 ` Baolin Wang
2015-12-03 15:47 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-12-04 4:57 ` Baolin Wang
2015-11-12 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5644AFA2.6040201@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dineshg@quicinc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).