From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wols Lists Subject: Re: WD Red vs Black drives for RAID1 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:07:28 +0000 Message-ID: <564A1B60.8050708@youngman.org.uk> References: <22090.1097.258820.65463@quad.stoffel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <22090.1097.258820.65463@quad.stoffel.home> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: John Stoffel , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 16/11/15 16:28, John Stoffel wrote: > > Guys, > > I'm starting to get tons of errors on my various mixed 1 and 2Tb > drives I have in a bunch of RAID 1 mirrors, generally triple mirrors. > It's time to start replacing them and I think I want to either go with > the WD Black 4Tb or the WD Red 4Tb drives. And with a pair of 500Gb > SSDs to use with lvmcache for speedup. > > Any comments? > I'm running Seagate Barracudas in a mirror (probably similar to the Blacks). I haven't come across reports of problems IN A MIRROR CONFIGURATION. However, I want to go Raid 5 (or 6) at some point, and all the advice is DON'T BUY DESKTOP DRIVES (ie Barracudas, Blacks, Greens) if that's the route you're planning on going down. So I've got to replace my Barracudas :-( If you want to go 5 or 6 (which might get you better response speeds too - I don't know), then Reds are your only choice. (Or Seagate NAS, because I'm a Seagate guy that's the route I might go.) Because desktop drives don't support proper error recovery, it's all too easy for what should be a little problem to trash the array - if you follow the list I'd say well over half the "help my array is trashed" threads here are caused because the person used desktop drives. The price difference isn't *that* much - I suspect a lot of people here will say if reliability trumps performance, pay extra for Red or NAS drives. Cheers, Wol