From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wols Lists Subject: Re: md failing mechanism Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 23:34:57 +0000 Message-ID: <56A2BCA1.6070005@youngman.org.uk> References: <56A26E11.2090703@yandex.ru> <56A28309.9080806@turmel.org> <56A2A2C3.9000801@yandex.ru> <56A2AAB1.6070305@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56A2AAB1.6070305@turmel.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Phil Turmel , Dark Penguin , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 22/01/16 22:18, Phil Turmel wrote: > Since that was written, 'A' would now include almost-enterprise drives > with RAID ratings like the Western Digital Red family. And the > recommended timeout for 'C' has drifted upward to 180. Almost all posts mention WD Reds. It's NOT a recommendation, but seeing as I've tended to buy Seagate (note my Barracudas) I looked for the Seagate equivalent. They're called NAS drives, and they cost roughly the same ... just pointing this out in case people like Seagate or dislike WD ... :-) Cheers, Wol