From: Ram Ramesh <rramesh2400@gmail.com>
To: John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>
Cc: Linux Raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Caching raid with SSD.
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:45:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DD0774.3070601@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22236.57403.411891.23182@quad.stoffel.home>
On 03/06/2016 07:58 PM, John Stoffel wrote:
> Ram> Any one here actually use SSD caches for RAID arrays? Can you
> Ram> share your experience and let me know your choice of the type of
> Ram> cache methods your tired/used and why you think one is better or
> Ram> worse than other? If it is possible, please provide raid
> Ram> type/size and ssd size used.
>
> I'm using a pair of 4Tb drives mirrored, and a pair of 512gb SSDs,
> also mirrored, along with lvmcache to setup my caching across a couple
> of volumes.
>
> I honestly haven't seen huge improvements, but I also haven't had the
> time to do any serious testing either. Whcih I should do. I've been
> sorta thinking that using the Phoronix testing stuff would be the way
> to go.
>
> My SSDs and 4Tb drives are all on an LSI 8-port SATA controller, PCI-E
> 4x I think. It's an MPT SAS-2 controller. I did this so that my boot
> drives are some partitions on the SSDs, and then I use two more
> mirrored partitions for the cache.
>
> And this is an NFS server for my home directories, etc.
>
> I didn't use bcache because you can't remove a cache device without
> rebooting, or at least bringing a device offline and back online,
> which doesn't fit my desires to be able to dynamically add/remove
> caches, esp for the testing I've never bothered to do.
>
> John
I do not have lvm, but already have a live (regular) file system. While
I can accept downtime, I cannot accept formatting drives/disks. I simply
do not have the extra space to copy back and forth. That is why I
thought of dmcache. I ran a fio experiment on my ssd (old curial M4) and
I am getting 6K (random) IOPs whereas my raid gives me about 1.5K. I
really do not see much point unless my new SSD puts out some decent
numbers stand alone.
Thanks for sharing the details of your setup.
Ramesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-07 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-05 21:06 Caching raid with SSD Ram Ramesh
2016-03-07 1:58 ` John Stoffel
2016-03-07 4:45 ` Ram Ramesh [this message]
2016-03-07 15:17 ` John Stoffel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DD0774.3070601@gmail.com \
--to=rramesh2400@gmail.com \
--cc=john@stoffel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).