From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:09:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570BD354.2000100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160411162306.GC9288@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
On Monday 11 April 2016 09:53 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> L stands for "Mailing list that is relevant to this area", and this is a
>> mailing list. :)
>
> Your proposed patch isn't changing the L entry, so this is of no relevance.
Sorry, I am not understanding.
The current entry in MAINTAINERS is:
DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)
M: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
M: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
M: dm-devel@redhat.com
L: dm-devel@redhat.com
...
So my patch just removed the line : "M: dm-devel@redhat.com"
So now the entry becomes :
DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)
M: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
M: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
L: dm-devel@redhat.com
...
So, now it correctly shows dm-devel@redhat.com as a mailing list which
should have cc to all the patches related to LVM.
Or am I understanding this wrong?
regards
sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-11 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-11 15:20 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Sudip Mukherjee
2016-04-11 15:51 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2016-04-11 16:15 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-04-11 16:23 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2016-04-11 16:39 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2016-04-11 18:50 ` Wols Lists
2016-04-11 21:08 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-11 22:25 ` Wols Lists
2016-04-11 23:03 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-11 23:31 ` Wols Lists
2016-04-11 23:43 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-12 5:31 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-04-11 23:52 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570BD354.2000100@gmail.com \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).