linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shli@fb.com, nfbrown@novell.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	hch@infradead.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] add bio_split_mddev
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 05:13:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574D55AF.1030005@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464326983-3798454-2-git-send-email-songliubraving@fb.com>



On 05/27/2016 01:29 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> similar to bio_clone_mddev, bio_alloc_mddev, this patch added
> bio_split_mddev, which uses a local bio set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> ---
>   drivers/md/md.c    | 14 +++++++++++---
>   drivers/md/md.h    |  2 ++
>   drivers/md/raid5.c |  2 +-
>   3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 866825f..f42f8d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,9 @@ static const struct block_device_operations md_fops;
>   
>   static int start_readonly;
>   
> -/* bio_clone_mddev
> - * like bio_clone, but with a local bio set
> +/* bio_alloc_mddev, bio_clone_mddev, bio_split_mddev
> + * like bio_alloc, bio_clone, bio_split, but with a local bio set
>    */
> -
>   struct bio *bio_alloc_mddev(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nr_iovecs,
>   			    struct mddev *mddev)
>   {
> @@ -187,6 +186,15 @@ struct bio *bio_clone_mddev(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_clone_mddev);
>   
> +struct bio *bio_split_mddev(struct bio *bio, int sectors,
> +			    gfp_t gfp, struct mddev *mddev)
> +{
> +	if (!mddev || !mddev->bio_set)
> +		return bio_split(bio, sectors, gfp, NULL);
> +	return bio_split(bio, sectors, gfp, mddev->bio_set);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_split_mddev);
> +

Compared with bio_alloc_mddev and bio_clone_mddev, there is no 
bio_split_bioset
func, I think use bio_split directly is enough. Also why the last 
parameter of the
first bio_split is NULL instead of fs_bio_set?

>   /*
>    * We have a system wide 'event count' that is incremented
>    * on any 'interesting' event, and readers of /proc/mdstat
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> index b5c4be7..9e1d4bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> @@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ extern struct bio *bio_clone_mddev(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>   				   struct mddev *mddev);
>   extern struct bio *bio_alloc_mddev(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nr_iovecs,
>   				   struct mddev *mddev);
> +extern struct bio *bio_split_mddev(struct bio *bio, int sectors,
> +				   gfp_t gfp, struct mddev *mddev);
>   
>   extern void md_unplug(struct blk_plug_cb *cb, bool from_schedule);
>   extern void md_reload_sb(struct mddev *mddev, int raid_disk);
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index ad9e15a..8e25e67 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -4871,7 +4871,7 @@ static struct bio *chunk_aligned_read(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *raid_bio)
>   		unsigned sectors = chunk_sects - (sector & (chunk_sects-1));
>   
>   		if (sectors < bio_sectors(raid_bio)) {
> -			split = bio_split(raid_bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, fs_bio_set);

The original place use fs_bio_set here.

> +			split = bio_split_mddev(raid_bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, mddev);
>   			bio_chain(split, raid_bio);
>   		} else
>   			split = raid_bio;

Thanks,
Guoqing

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-31  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-27  5:29 [RFC 0/5] raid5-cache: the write cache part Song Liu
2016-05-27  5:29 ` [RFC 1/5] add bio_split_mddev Song Liu
2016-05-31  9:13   ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2016-06-01 13:18     ` Song Liu
2016-05-27  5:29 ` [RFC 2/5] move stripe cache define and functions to raid5.h Song Liu
2016-05-27  5:29 ` [RFC 3/5] r5cache: look up stripe cache for chunk_aligned_read Song Liu
2016-06-01  2:52   ` NeilBrown
2016-06-01 13:23     ` Song Liu
2016-05-27  5:29 ` [RFC 4/5] r5cache: write part of r5cache Song Liu
2016-05-31  9:00   ` Guoqing Jiang
2016-06-01 13:13     ` Song Liu
2016-06-01  3:12   ` NeilBrown
2016-06-01 13:36     ` Song Liu
2016-06-01 22:37       ` NeilBrown
2016-05-27  5:29 ` [RFC 5/5] r5cache: naive reclaim approach Song Liu
2016-06-01  3:16   ` NeilBrown
2016-06-01 13:24     ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=574D55AF.1030005@suse.com \
    --to=gqjiang@suse.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfbrown@novell.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).