From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wols Lists Subject: Re: raid 5 crashed Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:36:21 +0100 Message-ID: <574F00F5.80801@youngman.org.uk> References: <20160511131524.GA11811@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <574C8EB9.3070706@youngman.org.uk> <574D958F.8060209@turmel.org> <574DDCBD.40801@youngman.org.uk> <95079572-f319-ca57-a3e9-e8d00ef40248@fnarfbargle.com> <20b1858b-0cd7-a7de-82af-9167dbcfb09e@fnarfbargle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20b1858b-0cd7-a7de-82af-9167dbcfb09e@fnarfbargle.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Brad Campbell , Edward Kuns Cc: Phil Turmel , bobzer , linux-raid , Mikael Abrahamsson List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 01/06/16 05:07, Brad Campbell wrote: > I have however done a *lot* of data recovery on single drives over the > years and can absolutely vouch that dd will leave you in tears. Good to know! I've regularly used dd on drives, but not on ones that were in trouble (maybe once ...) But now drives are at the point that you cannot guarantee an error-free scan even on just one pass, I guess I'll have to make sure I use ddrescue from now on - I usually just read an (old) drive into a file on a new larger hard disk, loopmount it, and proceed from there ... never had any trouble so far ... Cheers, Wol