From: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
To: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>,
Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Raid check didn't fix Current_Pending_Sector, but badblocks -nsv did
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:14:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5756D6DC.5090807@turmel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607135731.GA12550@metamorpher.de>
On 06/07/2016 09:57 AM, Andreas Klauer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:41:13AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>> Howdy, I have a raid 5 where one drive reported this:
>> 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 199 000 Old_age Always - 29
>
> RAID survival depends on healthy drives. This one does not look healthy.
> If the data on your RAID is important, I'd replace this drive. Getting
> this count back down to zero doesn't make it any more trustworthy.
That's excessively paranoid. You missed:
> 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0
In other words, the totally normal accumulation of weak spots on his
disk aren't being cleaned up by overwriting as expected from raid
scrubbing. The vast majority of such flaws are successfully overwritten
and are not a problem. When they are overwritten and the drive firmware
decides to reallocate, then you can start worrying. I replace drives
when *reallocations* hit double digits, as my experience says they go to
hell quickly between 10 and 100.
FWIW, all of my troubles with drives were consumer-grade, mostly w/
scterc support, @ > 35k hours. I'll report to the list when my first
big batch of WD reds starts to die.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-06 17:41 Raid check didn't fix Current_Pending_Sector, but badblocks -nsv did Marc MERLIN
2016-06-06 19:10 ` Sarah Newman
2016-06-06 22:44 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-06-07 0:54 ` Phil Turmel
2016-06-07 4:51 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-06-07 13:04 ` Phil Turmel
2016-06-07 13:56 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-06-07 14:04 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-06-08 1:39 ` Brad Campbell
2016-06-08 12:24 ` Phil Turmel
2016-06-07 5:35 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-06-07 13:57 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-06-07 14:14 ` Phil Turmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5756D6DC.5090807@turmel.org \
--to=philip@turmel.org \
--cc=Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc@merlins.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).