From: John Dawson <linux@celticblues.com>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can't mount Old RHEL 6 Raid with new install of CentOS 7, now can't mount with original RHEL 6
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:35:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57d23adc6db12d6a365dd2c6f50d4bf5@celticblues.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtQfBjhKh2Fu+W76JyXODFJJ9Qxjbyn7KK0i3ALs1xREgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry.. my bad... I am not using RHEL... I am using CentOS...
mdadm --version = mdadm - v3.2.3 - 23rd December 2011
When I try to assemble the raid I get the following errors:
sudo mdadm --assemble /dev/md127 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1
I get the following:
mdadm: /dev/md127 has been started with 2 drives.
When I try to mount
sudo mount /dev/md127 /proj
I get the following:
mount: you must specify the filesystem type
When I specify the filesystem type,
sudo mount -t ext4 /dev/md127 /proj/
I get the following:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md127,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error In some cases useful
info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so
===============================================
dmesg | tail
===============================================
md: md127 stopped.
md: bind<sdb1>
md: bind<sdc1>
bio: create slab <bio-1> at 1
md/raid0:md127: md_size is 3907039232 sectors.
md: RAID0 configuration for md127 - 1 zone
md: zone0=[sdc1/sdb1]
zone-offset= 0KB, device-offset= 0KB,
size=1953519616KB
EXT4-fs (md127): VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem
===============================================
"sudo mdadm -D /dev/md127" results
===============================================
/dev/md127:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Fri Aug 5 16:46:10 2016
Raid Level : raid0
Array Size : 1953519616 (1863.02 GiB 2000.40 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Fri Aug 5 16:46:10 2016
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Chunk Size : 512K
Name : mymachine:0 (local to host mymachine)
UUID : 8217dfb5:a97a15df:94a85926:3fea6697
Events : 0
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 33 0 active sync /dev/sdc1
1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
===============================================
"sudo mdadm --examine /dev/sdb1" results
===============================================
/dev/sdb1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 8217dfb5:a97a15df:94a85926:3fea6697
Name : mymachine:0 (local to host mymachine)
Creation Time : Fri Aug 5 16:46:10 2016
Raid Level : raid0
Raid Devices : 2
Avail Dev Size : 1953519616 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB)
Data Offset : 2048 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : d9bab0d7:793e5168:4457d25b:24614a41
Update Time : Fri Aug 5 16:46:10 2016
Checksum : 744c405e - correct
Events : 0
Chunk Size : 512K
Device Role : Active device 1
Array State : AA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
===============================================
"sudo mdadm --examine /dev/sdc1" results
===============================================
/dev/sdc1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 8217dfb5:a97a15df:94a85926:3fea6697
Name : mymachine:0 (local to host mymachine)
Creation Time : Fri Aug 5 16:46:10 2016
Raid Level : raid0
Raid Devices : 2
Avail Dev Size : 1953519616 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB)
Data Offset : 2048 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : a0dfb805:18718fed:6985075a:12fbb196
Update Time : Fri Aug 5 16:46:10 2016
Checksum : 7b2f5fd6 - correct
Events : 0
Chunk Size : 512K
Device Role : Active device 0
Array State : AA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
On 2016-08-11 20:38, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:19 AM, John Dawson <linux@celticblues.com>
> wrote:
>> I have a machine which had a drive with RHEL 6.X installed with a raid
>> device setup on separate disk(s). Installed a new hard disk in machine
>> and
>> installed CentOS 7. CentOS 7 wouldn't mount the raid. Put the old
>> drive
>> back in and now RHEL 6.X won't mount the raid. Is the raid permanently
>> hosed? Can I get the data on it back? How? Thx.
>
> RHEL comes with a support contract so you should contact Red Hat about
> that part.
>
> Also, not anywhere near enough information has been provided, almost
> like you think what you're experiencing is a widely known problem with
> a known solution. But it isn't. So you should provide mdadm -E
> information for each member block device, whether or not the array
> assembles manually, if not what error do you get in user and kernel
> space, and what command you're using to mount the array that you say
> fails, and what the error message is.
>
> Also include mdadm version on both systems because few people will
> have any idea what mdadm version is on the particular installation of
> RHEL and CentOS you're using, as these things aren't standardized at
> all across distros.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-16 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-11 12:19 Can't mount Old RHEL 6 Raid with new install of CentOS 7, now can't mount with original RHEL 6 John Dawson
2016-08-12 2:38 ` Chris Murphy
2016-08-16 17:35 ` John Dawson [this message]
2016-08-16 17:58 ` Chris Murphy
[not found] ` <fd2b2aab-a0c1-4e20-89e2-f859b488e4e9@Spark>
2016-08-16 18:44 ` Chris Murphy
[not found] ` <02fd3a31-b107-464d-aa58-2ccd5660d974@Spark>
2016-08-16 19:09 ` Chris Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57d23adc6db12d6a365dd2c6f50d4bf5@celticblues.com \
--to=linux@celticblues.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox