From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.de>
To: Zhilong Liu <zlliu@suse.com>, neilb@suse.com, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] test: revise 'test' and make it easier to understand
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:06:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58B92400.7010800@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488250053-10436-1-git-send-email-zlliu@suse.com>
On 02/28/2017 10:47 AM, Zhilong Liu wrote:
> 1. use 'Tab' as the code style.
> 2. arrange the testing steps and provide the 'main' entrance.
> 3. draft the log_save feature, it captures the /proc/mdstat,
> md superblock info, bitmap info and the detail dmesg.
> 4. modified the mdadm() func, adding the operation that clear
> the superblock when create or build one new array, and it
> would exit testing when mdadm command returned non-0 value.
> 5. delete no_errors() func, it only used in tests/04update-uuid,
> I recommend the new mdadm() using method.
> 6. delete fast_sync() func.
> 7. testdev(), add the object file checking, otherwise this command
> would create one regular file, it's one trouble thing.
> 8. add dmesg checking in do_test() func, it's necessary to check
> dmesg whether or not printed abnormal message.
> 9. add checking conditions in main(), such as $pwd/raid6check need
> exists, here is a prompt to remind users to 'make everything'
> before testing; the $targetdir should mount under ext[2-4] FS,
> because the external bitmap only supports ext, the bmap() API
> of bitmap.c doesn't exist in all filesystem, such as btrfs.
>
I like the improvement for the test, and I would suggest you split
those changes into smaller patches, make each patch do one thing,
it would be easier for Jes to review I think, and you still can merge
them into one finally if Jes prefer one patch with huge changes, :-) .
Cheers,
Guoqing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-27 12:37 exposed and pushed the mdadm/test improvement progress zhilong
2017-02-28 2:47 ` [PATCH RFC] test: revise 'test' and make it easier to understand Zhilong Liu
2017-03-02 22:26 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-03 8:06 ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2017-03-06 3:27 ` zhilong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58B92400.7010800@suse.de \
--to=gqjiang@suse.de \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=zlliu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).