From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Recovery on new 2TB disk: finish=7248.4min (raid1)
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 07:10:42 +0100
Message-ID: <590822E2.1080009@youngman.org.uk>
References: <590117CD.1000009@tesco.net>
 <22785.65375.947842.648174@quad.stoffel.home>
 <5492628.c8B43Z4h0G@matkor-lenovo>
 <22786.16524.435313.304834@quad.stoffel.home> <87o9veje3v.fsf@esperi.org.uk>
 <20170430182134.0e8c6dc0@natsu> <87fugpkhap.fsf@esperi.org.uk>
 <20170430214729.2a02cce5@natsu> <8737cojn54.fsf@esperi.org.uk>
 <20170502024657.6d33fd88@natsu>
 <6398208a-1345-bdec-4be6-a8bd98bfb089@youngman.org.uk>
 <20170502030307.4d7a77dd@natsu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170502030307.4d7a77dd@natsu>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
Cc: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>, John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>, Mateusz Korniak <mateusz-lists@ant.gliwice.pl>, Ron Leach <ronleach@tesco.net>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On 01/05/17 23:03, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>> > That's what I understood you to mean, but you are aware that SOME raid 
>> > management still has to be done with echo > /sys/... ?
>> > 
>> > So mdadm isn't perfect, not  by a long chalk, yet :-)
> Well, why not post some examples of what you find yourself doing often
> via /sys, that's not available in mdadm (maybe as a new thread).

I *should* do, rather than I *do* do, but your everyday general
maintenance tasks, like scrubbing?

I'm not aware of *any* day-to-day tasks that you do using mdadm - oh and
if you don't scrub it's not an uncommon cause of arrays crashing...

Cheers,
Wol