From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wols Lists Subject: Re: SMART detects pending sectors; take offline? Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:21:43 +0100 Message-ID: <59DC9127.2010102@youngman.org.uk> References: <629d29b4-a3ae-533f-bdba-f115e99d8ce4@shenkin.org> <8caa4fe1-c51f-6f3a-e16b-8795cf1b4071@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Shenkin , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 10/10/17 10:00, Alexander Shenkin wrote: >> Please read up on "timeout mismatch" before your array blows up. > > I have timeouts set on all drives when the system boots, and the same > script turns on the P300s' SCTERC. You may notice on the raid wiki that I've started putting up smartctl output from various drives. It would be nice to have the P300 there. When you get it, any chance you could email me the output of a "smartctl -x"? I notice on my Barracudas that I get different output depending on whether I've turned smarts on (it's disabled by default at power-on), so obviously I'd like it once smart is enabled :-) It's meant to give people a place to look to (try to) work out which drive is suitable for them. I've noticed with the drives I've got and what people have posted, that output is "weird" for some drives... Cheers, Wol