linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
To: Alexander Shenkin <al@shenkin.org>,
	Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>,
	Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>,
	Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SMART detects pending sectors; take offline?
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:01:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59DF4B80.5010807@youngman.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ab868eb-3ce3-f01b-ac9e-23358563040c@shenkin.org>

On 12/10/17 10:50, Alexander Shenkin wrote:
> Thanks Phil... Googling around, I haven't found a way to change it
> either, but then again, I'm not really sure what to search for.
> 
> What about changing my default disk timeout to something less than 120
> secs?  Say, 100 secs instead of 180?
> 
> Seems like this issue should probably make it into the timeout wiki
> page, no?  Perhaps some instructions on how to query your system's
> hangcheck timeout, and thus making sure that you set your drive timeouts
> to less than that?

Very much so. What is a "hangcheck timeout"?

My wife has kindly bought the basics I need for a new PC for my birthday
(yeah! :-) and I've ordered two Seagate Ironwolfs to go with it, so I
will be setting this up from scratch. Raid, KVM, LVM, the works. So
hangcheck timeouts, documenting on the wiki, all the other bits, the
important thing is I'll have a brand new system I can play with that's
not got anything important on it and if the system (software side only,
of course :-) gets trashed, so what. I can try stuff out without
worrying about putting my live system at risk.

But back to topic. I know we have the disk timeout (on desktop drives,
any random number up to 180secs :-). We have the linux i/o wait timeout
- by default 30 secs. And now we have the hangcheck timeout, whatever
that is ...

Cheers,
Wol

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-07  7:48 SMART detects pending sectors; take offline? Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-07  8:21 ` Carsten Aulbert
2017-10-07 10:05   ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-07 17:29     ` Wols Lists
2017-10-08  9:19       ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-08  9:49         ` Wols Lists
2017-10-09 20:16   ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-10  9:00     ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10  9:11       ` Reindl Harald
2017-10-10  9:56         ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10 12:55           ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-11 10:31             ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-11 17:10               ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-12  9:50                 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-12 11:01                   ` Wols Lists [this message]
2017-10-12 13:04                     ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-12 13:16                       ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-12 13:21                         ` Mark Knecht
2017-10-12 15:16                           ` Edward Kuns
2017-10-12 15:52                             ` Edward Kuns
2017-10-15 14:41                               ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-18 15:51                               ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-18 16:09                                 ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-19 10:35                                   ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-19 12:02                                     ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-21 11:28                                       ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-21 11:38                                         ` Reindl Harald
2017-12-23  3:14                                           ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-03 12:44                                             ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-03 13:26                                               ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-03 13:50                                                 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-03 15:53                                                   ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-03 15:59                                                     ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-03 16:02                                                       ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-04 10:37                                                         ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-04 12:28                                                           ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-04 13:16                                                             ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-04 13:39                                                               ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05  5:20                                                                 ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05  5:25                                                                   ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05 10:10                                                                     ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05 10:32                                                                       ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05 13:50                                                                       ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-05 14:01                                                                         ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05 15:59                                                                         ` Wols Lists
2017-10-12 15:19                   ` Kai Stian Olstad
2017-10-10 22:23           ` josh
2017-10-11  6:23             ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10  9:21       ` Wols Lists

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59DF4B80.5010807@youngman.org.uk \
    --to=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
    --cc=al@shenkin.org \
    --cc=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
    --cc=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philip@turmel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).