From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
To: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
Cc: Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mdadm stuck at 0% reshape after grow
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 17:06:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A29752A.9060007@youngman.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171207135832.GA4858@metamorpher.de>
On 07/12/17 13:58, Andreas Klauer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:19:17PM -0600, Edward Kuns wrote:
>> 1) If I have bad blocks lists configured, how do I safely remove them?
>
> --assemble with --update=no-bbl is safe, since it only removes if empty.
> If not empty, likely you'll end up doing --update=force-no-bbl anyway.
>
>> # smartctl -l scterc,70,70 /dev/sdb ; echo $?
>> smartctl 6.5 2016-05-07 r4318 [x86_64-linux-4.8.13-100.fc23.x86_64]
>> (local build)
>> Copyright (C) 2002-16, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
>>
>> SCT Commands not supported
>>
>> 0
>
> It'd be hilarious if the timeout FUD on this list came with advice that
> didn't even do anything for most people, and nobody ever noticed...
>
> Unfortunately, it returns 4 here. And there are years old posts that
> explicitely check for it returning 4, so this shouldn't be new at all.
>
> Perhaps it's an intermittent error specific to your smartctl version?
>
> You can just set the timeouts unconditionally, if you really want them.
>
Except bash is back-to-front. True is 0, anything else is false.
So I'm guessing the above drive you've quoted DOES support erc,
therefore it's returned 0 (true) to say everything's okay.
Does your drive support erc? I guess not? So an error code of 4 is
*correct*, and in the sameple script on the wiki will trigger the code
that sets the *kernel* timeout to 180. My Barracudas return 4 ...
Cheers,
Wol
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-07 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 9:41 mdadm stuck at 0% reshape after grow Jeremy Graham
2017-12-05 10:56 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-05 15:49 ` Nix
2017-12-05 15:55 ` 002
2017-12-06 2:51 ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-06 4:33 ` Jeremy Graham
2017-12-06 7:36 ` Jeremy Graham
2017-12-06 13:34 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-06 14:02 ` 002
2017-12-06 10:49 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-12-06 14:15 ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-06 16:03 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-12-06 16:21 ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-06 18:24 ` 002
2017-12-07 8:40 ` Jeremy Graham
2017-12-06 20:19 ` Edward Kuns
2017-12-07 10:26 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-07 13:58 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-12-07 17:06 ` Wols Lists [this message]
2017-12-07 17:40 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-12-07 20:31 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-07 23:40 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-08 1:25 ` 002
2017-12-09 0:20 ` Edward Kuns
2017-12-14 12:43 ` Brad Campbell
2017-12-14 17:32 ` Edward Kuns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A29752A.9060007@youngman.org.uk \
--to=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
--cc=Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox