From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wols Lists Subject: Re: Raid6 recovery Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:23:32 +0000 Message-ID: <5E788014.3080203@youngman.org.uk> References: <5E75163B.2050602@youngman.org.uk> <50fc13d2-bd5f-d3c3-09f6-f7274aeaf917@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <50fc13d2-bd5f-d3c3-09f6-f7274aeaf917@turmel.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Phil Turmel , Glenn Greibesland Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 22/03/20 00:32, Phil Turmel wrote: > However, there have been bugs in --force that would cause it to not > assemble. Also, I believe latest behavior for --re-add would not have > damaged the metadata. And note that the website does tell you always to use the latest version of mdadm when trying to recover an array ... because it's linux-only it's pretty easy to build from source if you have to. Cheers, Wol