From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Any hope for a 27 disk RAID6+1HS array with four disks
     reporting "No md superblock detected"?
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:01:19 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <5b35884ec706518d378265e6b95ace53.squirrel@neil.brown.name>
References: <1233775657.10151.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
    <18827.51024.270348.20624@notabene.brown>
    <1233952325.9786.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1233952325.9786.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: tjb@unh.edu
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Sat, February 7, 2009 7:32 am, Thomas J. Baker wrote:

> Thanks for the info. I think I follow everything. One last question
> before really trying it - is this what is expected when I actually run
> the command - the warnings about previous array, etc?

Yes, you would expect exactly those messages.

NeilBrown