From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Eric Shubert <ejs@shubes.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3-drive RAID1 for my low use home server?
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:59:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b1003240759s97b4f1ex92b29c79d2aff39f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hod8pf$imk$1@dough.gmane.org>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Eric Shubert <ejs@shubes.net> wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Just triple checking what I think I've learned here before I start
>> loading Gentoo. Parts are arriving and I'm staring to put them
>> together to build a combo low-use server (backups and MythTV) as well
>> as desktop for my wife. I can do anything up to 6 drives but want the
>> RAID to survive in the face of possibly two drive failure. This is all
>> low bandwidth stuff.
>>
>> I'm fairly focused at this point on doing RAID1 using 3 drives.
>> Unless I hear differently I believe a 3-drive RAID1 could survive 2
>> drive failures, and as well any single drive could be taken to another
>> machine or even placed in an external USB/eSATA drive container in the
>> event of some major motherboard failure. Is any of that incorrect?
>
> All sounds right to me. Just be sure that the array is defined with 3 drives
> and no spares.
>
>> Also, along the way folks have mentioned hot spares but I'm not
>> seeing that a hot spare does much for RAID1. Am I incorrect about
>> that?
>
> Right. The only thing it would buy you is a little write performance, but
> you'd lose a little read performance, and take a performance hit if/when one
> drive goes off.
>
>> Granted, I guess the rebuild starts automatically and maybe
>> that's worth it, but I'm thinking that mdadm can probably let me know
>> fairly quickly that I need to do some work. I've purchased 6 drives so
>> I'll have 2 or 3 spares around and I can do a hot spare but I don't
>> see the value in spinning the drive for a year burning power and
>> wearing the drive out vs. just putting it on the shelf and keeping it
>> in reserve for a rainy day.
>
> Just one thought here. There is a certain "infant mortality syndrome" that
> drives experience (according to google study). I would rotate drives from
> the shelf into service after a year or so, while they're still under
> warranty (assuming 3yr warranty). If the warranty period is less than 2yr,
> rotate them sooner.
>
> NJoy!
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
Thanks Eric. I'll keep this in mind.
Other than the work involved in fixing things this is a home setup so
if it was down for a day or two it's not like a mission critical or
anything.
Also, the really critical coming from another machine that has two RAID's in it:
1) Main RAID is RAID0 using RAID class drives. (Lower reliability but
speed where I need it.)
2) Backup RAID in first machine is a 3 drive RAID 1.
3) This 2nd machine which also has RAID1 as we've been speaking aobut.
So, machine 1 runs RAID0 for work and then automatically backs up data
every few hours to a RAID1 internal to the same box. Once a day I will
then back up the machine 1 RAID1 to machine 2's RAID1 so I'm covered
twice. If one RAID1 does down then I can basically just fix it will
the other RAID1 keeps me safe.
Certainly, every so often I go offsite for even more protection.
Cheers,
Mark
Cheers,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-24 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-23 21:37 3-drive RAID1 for my low use home server? Mark Knecht
2010-03-24 14:49 ` Eric Shubert
2010-03-24 14:59 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bdc1c8b1003240759s97b4f1ex92b29c79d2aff39f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=ejs@shubes.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).