linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raz <raziebe@gmail.com>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:42:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d96567b0706211242p7f03bd1cw9102ae3e44d67cee@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706211312480.5806@gheavc.wnzcbav.cig>

What is your raid configuration ?
Please note that the stripe_cache_size is acting as a bottle neck in some cases.



On 6/21/07, Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net> wrote:
>
> I've been futzing with stripe_cache_size on a 3x component raid5,
> using 2.6.18.8-0.3-default on x86_64 (openSUSE 10.2).
>
> With the value set at 4096 I get pretty great write numbers.
> 2048 and on down the write numbers slowly drop.
>
> However, at values above 512 the 'check' performance is terrible. By
> 'check' performance I mean the value displayed by /proc/mdstat after
> I issue:
>
> echo check > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action
>
> When I say "terrible" I mean < 3MB/s.
> When I use 384, the performance goes to ~70MB/s
> 512.. 72-73MB/s
> 640.. 73-74MB/s
>
> 768.. 3300 K/s. Wow!
>
> Can somebody 'splain to me what is going on?
>
> --
> Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


-- 
Raz

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-21 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-21 18:28 stripe_cache_size and performance Jon Nelson
2007-06-21 19:42 ` Raz [this message]
2007-06-21 23:09   ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-22 15:01     ` Raz
2007-06-22 15:10       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 16:48         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-25 17:00           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 18:20             ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 18:21               ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 18:42           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 19:48             ` stripe_cache_size and performance [BUG with =64kb] Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 19:49               ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 20:36                 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 20:42                   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 22:12     ` stripe_cache_size and performance Jon Nelson
2007-06-25 22:19       ` Dan Williams
2007-06-25 23:23         ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-25 22:21       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-26 13:58         ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-26 14:00           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-26 14:16             ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-26 14:37               ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-26 15:22                 ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-26 15:54                   ` Justin Piszcz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d96567b0706211242p7f03bd1cw9102ae3e44d67cee@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=raziebe@gmail.com \
    --cc=jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).