From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2ACC433EF for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 22:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231651AbiGPWjU (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:39:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45738 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229501AbiGPWjT (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:39:19 -0400 Received: from zimbra.karlsbakk.net (zimbra.karlsbakk.net [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:1f:4ca5::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299D6140E3 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 15:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by zimbra.karlsbakk.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BE83C1200; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 00:39:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.karlsbakk.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zimbra.karlsbakk.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id kiAlAQEgPjO5; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 00:39:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by zimbra.karlsbakk.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5A73C1E37; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 00:39:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zimbra.karlsbakk.net CF5A73C1E37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=karlsbakk.net; s=1DC131FE-D37A-11E7-BD32-3AD4DFE620DF; t=1658011153; bh=4yW5dHI6eWGRnylzv3Mb/JDJFlQ5EZS5iRFZeVk/U+0=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=LYVwzZqRO7B45Cryjn9o/EPb2DcuZKn2M2qV4vu8wp9LHoG/FeUBtbNqOqCl45lRQ bHUSthUhvvpeem40Skfb3RkJPdEpulYaramotKWoljpUgBNUie44lfbLLQs11UZWh4 Qt4riWeR6MjJvBTvyM9535+tU7yTj1hUF8zNeGdpgM//mxknUfSL88c9xMywcGwz7+ 7S/FHMwsG69Y56r0RloNF/xgZZbMIV9KRIgebTO9P83uaeeHgY+PLwJ1EObvMt1UZq V3fYwcku1sVk4p1i6rl0UzKRnlsrcn0jjUl3QdFN+3JKR2qB0Xhqfg4VsWGiVy7L8F Quq/15wjqnh/Q== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.karlsbakk.net Received: from zimbra.karlsbakk.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zimbra.karlsbakk.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5pwsJrxjKTlb; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 00:39:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.karlsbakk.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.karlsbakk.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0C33C1200; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 00:39:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 00:39:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk To: esqychd2f5 Cc: Linux Raid Message-ID: <60336221.14987498.1658011153157.JavaMail.zimbra@karlsbakk.net> In-Reply-To: <4837-1658010660-795188@sneakemail.com> References: <4837-1658010660-795188@sneakemail.com> Subject: Re: Determining cause of md RAID 'recovery interrupted' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [2001:700:700:403::6:104b] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.10_GA_3801 (ZimbraWebClient - FF102 (Mac)/8.8.10_GA_3786) Thread-Topic: Determining cause of md RAID 'recovery interrupted' Thread-Index: tpKmLGg6DXwbrdJt47n5dbmyYkBQ3Q== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Perhaps replacing that drive should be a good idea, then. Also - don't mdad= m --replace it - better --fail, --remove and --add. Otherwise, md might jus= t replicate the badblock list unless you turn the shite off first. ZFS hand= les this far better, that's true, but I chose to go back to md since zfs is= n't really very flexible. Vennlig hilsen roy --=20 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 98013356 http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt -- Hi=C3=B0 g=C3=B3=C3=B0a skaltu =C3=AD stein h=C3=B6ggva, hi=C3=B0 illa =C3= =AD snj=C3=B3 rita. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "esqychd2f5" > To: "Linux Raid" > Sent: Sunday, 17 July, 2022 00:31:00 > Subject: Re: Determining cause of md RAID 'recovery interrupted' > Roy, >=20 > Thanks, one of the drives does have a badblocks list (/dev/sdc). It > is also the only one with reallocated sectors (56 of them). No drives > have a non-zero 'Current_Pending_Sector'. >=20 > This would explain why the rebuild worked for a while, but not now. > It doesn't explain whatever was happening to make drives drop out of > the array, but I'll resolve the rebuild issue before digging into > that. I want to understand what is failing here before I put the > drives back into use. I may leave the drive with reallocated sectors > out when I reuse the drives. >=20 > The MD array has a ZFS volume on it (meaning it should get checksum > errors if there are problems), and doesn't have critical data, so I > followed your instructions on how to disable the BBL and restarted the > rebuild. I'll see if it completes now. >=20 > Joe