linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com>,
	David Sloan <David.Sloan@eideticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] md/raid5: Pivot raid5_make_request()
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:06:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61411981-6401-aaa7-9d3d-6a9ac1fec4f2@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420195425.34911-13-logang@deltatee.com>



On 4/21/22 3:54 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:

> The number of times the lock is taken can be reduced by pivoting
> raid5_make_request() so that it loops through every stripe and then
> loops through every disk in that stripe to see if the bio must be
> added. This reduces the number of times the lock must be taken by
> a factor equal to the number of data disks.
>
> To accomplish this, store the minimum and maxmimum disk sector that
> has already been finished and continue to the next logical sector if
> it is found that the disk sector has already been done. Then add a
> add_all_stripe_bios() to check all the bios for overlap and add them
> all if none of them overlap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe<logang@deltatee.com>
> ---
>   drivers/md/raid5.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   drivers/md/raid5.h |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 40a25c4b80bd..f86866cb15be 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -3571,6 +3571,48 @@ static bool add_stripe_bio(struct stripe_head *sh, struct bio *bi,
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> +static int add_all_stripe_bios(struct stripe_head *sh, struct bio *bi,
> +		sector_t first_logical_sector, sector_t last_sector,
> +		int forwrite, int previous)
> +{
> +	int dd_idx;
> +	int ret = 1;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
> +
> +	for (dd_idx = 0; dd_idx < sh->disks; dd_idx++) {
> +		struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[dd_idx];
> +
> +		clear_bit(R5_BioReady, &dev->flags);
> +
> +		if (dd_idx == sh->pd_idx)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (dev->sector < first_logical_sector ||
> +		    dev->sector >= last_sector)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (stripe_bio_overlaps(sh, bi, dd_idx, forwrite)) {
> +			set_bit(R5_Overlap, &dev->flags);
> +			ret = 0;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		set_bit(R5_BioReady, &dev->flags);

Is  it possible to just call __add_stripe_bio here? And change above 
"continue"
to "return",

> +	}
> +
> +	if (!ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	for (dd_idx = 0; dd_idx < sh->disks; dd_idx++)
> +		if (test_bit(R5_BioReady, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags))
> +			__add_stripe_bio(sh, bi, dd_idx, forwrite, previous);

then we don't need another loop here, also no need to introduce another 
flag.
But I am not sure it is feasible, so just FYI.

> +
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static void end_reshape(struct r5conf *conf);
>   
>   static void stripe_set_idx(sector_t stripe, struct r5conf *conf, int previous,
> @@ -5869,6 +5911,10 @@ enum stripe_result {
>   struct stripe_request_ctx {
>   	bool do_flush;
>   	struct stripe_head *batch_last;
> +	sector_t disk_sector_done;
> +	sector_t start_disk_sector;
> +	bool first_wrap;
> +	sector_t last_sector;
>   };

Could you add some comments to above members if possible?

>   static enum stripe_result make_stripe_request(struct mddev *mddev,
> @@ -5908,6 +5954,36 @@ static enum stripe_result make_stripe_request(struct mddev *mddev,
>   
>   	new_sector = raid5_compute_sector(conf, logical_sector, previous,
>   					  &dd_idx, NULL);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This is a tricky algorithm to figure out which stripe_heads that
> +	 * have already been visited and exit early if the stripe_head has
> +	 * already been done. (Seeing all disks are added to a stripe_head
> +	 * once in add_all_stripe_bios().
> +	 *
> +	 * To start with, the disk sector of the last stripe that has been
> +	 * completed is stored in ctx->disk_sector_done. If the new_sector is
> +	 * less than this value, the stripe_head has already been done.
> +	 *
> +	 * There's one issue with this: if the request starts in the middle of
> +	 * a chunk, all the stripe heads before the starting offset will be
> +	 * missed. To account for this, set the first_wrap boolean to true
> +	 * if new_sector is less than the starting sector. Clear the
> +	 * boolean once the start sector is hit for the second time.
> +	 * When first_wrap is set, ignore the disk_sector_done.
> +	 */
> +	if (ctx->start_disk_sector == MaxSector) {
> +		ctx->start_disk_sector = new_sector;
> +	} else if (new_sector < ctx->start_disk_sector) {
> +		ctx->first_wrap = true;
> +	} else if (new_sector == ctx->start_disk_sector) {
> +		ctx->first_wrap = false;
> +		ctx->start_disk_sector = 0;
> +		return STRIPE_SUCCESS;
> +	} else if (!ctx->first_wrap && new_sector <= ctx->disk_sector_done) {
> +		return STRIPE_SUCCESS;
> +	}
> +

Hmm, with above tricky algorithm, I guess the point is that we can avoid 
to call below
stripe_add_to_batch_list where has hash_lock contention. If so, maybe we 
can change
stripe_can_batch for the purpose.

>   	if (stripe_can_batch(sh)) {
>   		stripe_add_to_batch_list(conf, sh, ctx->batch_last);
>   		if (ctx->batch_last)
> @@ -5977,8 +6057,10 @@ static enum stripe_result make_stripe_request(struct mddev *mddev,
>   static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
>   {
>   	struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
> -	sector_t logical_sector, last_sector;
> -	struct stripe_request_ctx ctx = {};
> +	sector_t logical_sector;
> +	struct stripe_request_ctx ctx = {
> +		.start_disk_sector = MaxSector,
> +	};
>   	const int rw = bio_data_dir(bi);
>   	enum stripe_result res;
>   	DEFINE_WAIT(w);
> @@ -6021,7 +6103,7 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
>   	}
>   
>   	logical_sector = bi->bi_iter.bi_sector & ~((sector_t)RAID5_STRIPE_SECTORS(conf)-1);
> -	last_sector = bio_end_sector(bi);
> +	ctx.last_sector = bio_end_sector(bi);
>   	bi->bi_next = NULL;
>   
>   	/* Bail out if conflicts with reshape and REQ_NOWAIT is set */
> @@ -6036,7 +6118,7 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
>   	}
>   	md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
>   	prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> -	while (logical_sector < last_sector) {
> +	while (logical_sector < ctx.last_sector) {
>   		res = make_stripe_request(mddev, conf, &ctx, logical_sector,
>   					  bi);
>   		if (res == STRIPE_FAIL) {
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
> index 638d29863503..e73b58844f83 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
> @@ -308,6 +308,7 @@ enum r5dev_flags {
>   	R5_Wantwrite,
>   	R5_Overlap,	/* There is a pending overlapping request
>   			 * on this block */
> +	R5_BioReady,    /* The current bio can be added to this disk */

This doesn't seem right to me, since the comment describes bio status 
while others
are probably for r5dev.

Thanks,
Guoqing

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20 19:54 [PATCH v2 00/12] Improve Raid5 Lock Contention Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of_reshape() function Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-21  9:17   ` Paul Menzel
2022-04-21 16:05     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21 23:33       ` Wol
2022-04-27  1:28   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 16:07     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-28  1:49       ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-28 15:44         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-29  0:24           ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] md/raid5: Refactor raid5_make_request loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  1:32   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 16:08     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-28  1:16       ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] md/raid5: Move stripe_add_to_batch_list() call out of add_stripe_bio() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-27  1:33   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] md/raid5: Move common stripe count increment code into __find_stripe() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  1:33   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] md/raid5: Factor out helper from raid5_make_request() loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] md/raid5: Drop the do_prepare flag in raid5_make_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:11   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] md/raid5: Move read_seqcount_begin() into make_stripe_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:13   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] md/raid5: Refactor for loop in raid5_make_request() into while loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] md/raid5: Keep a reference to last stripe_head for batch Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  1:36   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 23:27     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] md/raid5: Refactor add_stripe_bio() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] md/raid5: Check all disks in a stripe_head for reshape progress Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  1:53   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 16:11     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] md/raid5: Pivot raid5_make_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-21 15:54     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-27  2:06   ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2022-04-27 16:18     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-28  1:32       ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-21  8:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Improve Raid5 Lock Contention Xiao Ni
2022-04-21 16:02   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-24  8:00     ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-25 15:39       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-25 16:12         ` Xiao Ni
2022-04-28 21:22           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-29  0:49             ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-29 16:01               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-30  1:44                 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-24  7:53 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-25 15:37   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-25 23:07 ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61411981-6401-aaa7-9d3d-6a9ac1fec4f2@linux.dev \
    --to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=David.Sloan@eideticom.com \
    --cc=Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).