From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Spare disk could not sleep / standby
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 06:46:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62b0912f05030721465e84e4da@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16941.14813.465306.72004@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote:
> Then after 20ms with no write, they are all marked 'clean'.
> Then before the next write they are all marked 'active'.
>
> As the event count needs to be updated every time the superblock is
> modified, the event count will be updated forever active->clean or
> clean->active transition.
So.. Sorry if I'm a bit slow here.. But what you're saying is:
The kernel marks the partition clean when all writes have expired to disk.
This change is propagated through MD, and when it is, it causes the
event counter to rise, thus causing a write, thus marking the
superblock active. 20 msecs later, the same scenario repeats itself.
Is my perception of the situation correct?
Seems like a design flaw to me, but then again, I'm biased towards
hating this behaviour since I really like being able to put inactive
RAIDs to sleep..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-08 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-08 4:05 Spare disk could not sleep / standby Peter Evertz
2005-03-08 4:14 ` Guy
2005-03-08 4:40 ` Neil Brown
2005-03-08 5:20 ` Molle Bestefich
2005-03-08 5:36 ` Neil Brown
2005-03-08 5:46 ` Molle Bestefich [this message]
2005-03-08 6:03 ` Neil Brown
2005-03-08 6:24 ` Molle Bestefich
[not found] ` <422D625C.5020803@medien.uni-weimar.de>
2005-03-08 8:57 ` Molle Bestefich
2005-03-08 10:51 ` Tobias Hofmann
2005-03-08 13:13 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-03-09 5:11 ` Brad Campbell
2005-03-09 9:03 ` Tobias Hofmann
2005-03-08 8:51 ` David Greaves
2005-03-08 15:59 ` Mike Tran
2005-03-09 15:53 ` Spare disk could not sleep / standby [probably dangerous PATCH] Peter Evertz
2005-03-09 10:44 ` Mike Tran
2005-03-09 20:05 ` Peter Evertz
2005-03-09 16:29 ` Mike Tran
2005-03-09 23:20 ` Peter Evertz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62b0912f05030721465e84e4da@mail.gmail.com \
--to=molle.bestefich@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).