* raid related... or not ?
@ 2005-04-21 7:46 peter.greis
2005-04-21 8:36 ` Molle Bestefich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: peter.greis @ 2005-04-21 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
I appeal to the larger community...
I am running an ASUS k8ne with a mirrored boot drive, and a 4 disk raid5 array (total of 6). Approximately two weeks ago the raid5 array (reiser -> lvm2 -> raid5) kicked out a drive, which I reinserted (three hour rebuild). Shortly thereafter (this is my server), my clients started having NFS woes. After some head banging, I ran ping from the server to the clients. 80 - 100% packet loss (I note here I am using a Netgear gigabit card).
Nothing in /var/log/messages, nothing special from dmesg. Last night I plugged a laptop into the same drop as the server - ping works perfectly from there to the clients... so cabling doesn't seem to be the issue. Then I pulled the gig card and put a spare 100M card in. Oddly enough, same behavior (now with the link running at 100 instead of 1000). I put the original card back in, but moved it over one slot. Same thing.... Still no messages. No packet collisions with "netstat -i 5" either. At one point (playing with ethtool), I also got nothing back from "ethtool eth0" - which I find very odd. Later, ethtool did return data.
All of this has been tried with both 2.6.8.1 and 2.6.11.7 kernels. At this point I am thinking hardware failure (like the motherboard), but I am looking for opinions. What to try next ? This is crippling my home environment (home directories are shared from here as well as music and video). Also, how are you testing your arrays (are the SMART tools working under raid yet) ?
Any help would be appreciated (the WAF is falling rapidly)
regards,
-Peter
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: raid related... or not ?
2005-04-21 7:46 raid related... or not ? peter.greis
@ 2005-04-21 8:36 ` Molle Bestefich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Molle Bestefich @ 2005-04-21 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peter.greis@ubs.com; +Cc: linux-raid
peter.greis@ubs.com wrote:
> All of this has been tried with both 2.6.8.1 and 2.6.11.7 kernels. At this point I am thinking hardware failure (like the motherboard), but I am looking for opinions. What to try next ?
Make sure that autonegotiation works?
If, for example, your netgear NIC thinks it's running full duplex and
the switch thinks it's running half, you'll probably get packet loss.
Try forcing both the port on the switch and the network adapter to use
the same speed+duplex setting and see if that works better.
And what have all this got to do with linux-raid?
Nothing?
> Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
>
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only
> for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
> should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
> notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
> e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
>
> E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
> does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
> of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
> verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
> message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
> construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
> related financial instruments.
Cut the crap when posting to public mailing lists.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-21 8:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-21 7:46 raid related... or not ? peter.greis
2005-04-21 8:36 ` Molle Bestefich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).