From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: raid 10 or 1+0 ?
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:01:56 +0200
Message-ID: <62b0912f05042513014cea5b10@mail.gmail.com>
References: <876ef97a05042304262d0b5c3a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200504231621.j3NGLMm17613@www.watkins-home.com>
Reply-To: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200504231621.j3NGLMm17613@www.watkins-home.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Guy wrote:
> md supports a built-in RAID10.
> RAID10 can be used with an odd number of disks and is a single array.

*sighs a bit*.. If that's true, someone should perhaps update
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundant_array_of_independent_disks#RAID_10
to reflect the fact that MD's notion of RAID10 is different from other
vendors'.