From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: raid 10 or 1+0 ?
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:08:18 +0200
Message-ID: <62b0912f050425130869cff461@mail.gmail.com>
References: <876ef97a05042304262d0b5c3a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200504231621.j3NGLMm17613@www.watkins-home.com>
	 <62b0912f05042513014cea5b10@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <62b0912f05042513014cea5b10@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Guy wrote:
> > md supports a built-in RAID10.
> > RAID10 can be used with an odd number of disks and is a single array.
> 
> *sighs a bit*..
[snip]

Doesn't look that bad actually.  There's a vendor section called
"proprietary raid levels" where "Linux MD RAID 10" would fit in
nicely.  So if anybody knows enough about how MD RAID 10 works, here's
something to do when you get bored :-).