From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Molle Bestefich Subject: Re: sata_nv and RAID1 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:18:58 +0200 Message-ID: <62b0912f050614161875a4913c@mail.gmail.com> References: <200506111613.42962.dvadell@lantech.com.ar> <20050611192606.GA4055@pentafluge.infradead.org> <42AB49BC.50104@tls.msk.ru> <42AD2B85.30303@pobox.com> <42AD74BD.8050704@tls.msk.ru> <62b0912f05061414116f7afedc@mail.gmail.com> <42AF4E17.2040900@tls.msk.ru> <62b0912f0506141526358647d0@mail.gmail.com> <42AF631C.1050806@tmr.com> Reply-To: Molle Bestefich Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42AF631C.1050806@tmr.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bill Davidsen Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Bill Davidsen wrote: > Molle Bestefich wrote: > > So you don't care that your Linux system will deadlock if a PATA disk > > is removed, for instance? Just an example, one that I've seen happen > > a couple of times. Never seen it with Windows, it just tells you that > > the disk is gone. > > Actually I suspect most Linux users are smart enough not to pull a PATA > drive out while in use, and it works just fine if you offline the drive > before removal. That's not a good argument, other things can happen to throw a disk offline. Flaky IDE or power cables and disk failure come to mind.