From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BC9C4338F for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB8460FF2 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234946AbhHIMjj (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 08:39:39 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:25820 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235536AbhHIMjh (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 08:39:37 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10070"; a="214669474" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,307,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="214669474" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2021 05:39:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,307,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="438911441" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2021 05:39:01 -0700 Received: from [10.213.0.184] (mtkaczyk-MOBL1.ger.corp.intel.com [10.213.0.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D89580922; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] md-fixes 20210804 To: Song Liu , linux-raid References: <2D64F5A2-3D1B-4D27-BEA7-81B03B30D212@fb.com> <145aaf29-535b-a0b5-3c6d-25b036df6dbb@kernel.dk> From: "Tkaczyk, Mariusz" Message-ID: <66c72f4f-7fa0-7491-e4ea-8d8a82483aaa@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:38:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <145aaf29-535b-a0b5-3c6d-25b036df6dbb@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org On 04.08.2021 23:50, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 8/4/21 3:47 PM, Song Liu wrote: >> Hi Jens, >> >> Please consider pulling the following fix on top of your for-5.14/block> branch. > Hi Song, Could you describe idea behind of "md-next" and "md-fixes" branches? I'm asking because we are running regression on "md-next", but since development has been divided into two separate branches I probably need to change current approach. Thanks, Mariusz