From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, song@kernel.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] md/raid10: reduce lock contention for io
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:40:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <691f9d94-f650-0f04-2d49-74fe84c24bfe@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220829131502.165356-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On 8/29/22 9:14 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> patch 1 is a small problem found by code review.
> patch 2 avoid holding resync_lock in fast path.
> patch 3 avoid holding lock in wake_up() in fast path.
>
> Test environment:
>
> Architecture: aarch64
> Cpu: Huawei KUNPENG 920, there are four numa nodes
>
> Raid10 initialize:
> mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level 10 --bitmap none --raid-devices 4 /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1 /dev/nvme3n1
>
> Test cmd:
> fio -name=0 -ioengine=libaio -direct=1 -group_reporting=1 -randseed=2022 -rwmixread=70 -refill_buffers -filename=/dev/md0 -numjobs=16 -runtime=60s -bs=4k -iodepth=256 -rw=randread
>
> Test result:
> before this patchset: 2.9 GiB/s
> after this patchset: 6.6 Gib/s
Impressive! Pls try mdadm test suites too to avoid regression.
> Please noted that in kunpeng-920, memory access latency is very bad
> accross nodes compare to local node, and in other architecture
> performance improvement might not be significant.
By any chance can someone try with x64?
Thanks,
Guoqing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 13:14 [PATCH -next 0/3] md/raid10: reduce lock contention for io Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 13:15 ` [PATCH -next 1/3] md/raid10: fix improper BUG_ON() in raise_barrier() Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 19:53 ` John Stoffel
2022-08-30 1:01 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-30 6:32 ` Paul Menzel
2022-08-29 13:15 ` [PATCH -next 2/3] md/raid10: convert resync_lock to use seqlock Yu Kuai
2022-09-01 18:41 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-02 0:49 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-02 0:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-02 1:00 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-02 1:21 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-02 8:14 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-02 17:03 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-03 6:07 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-02 9:42 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-02 10:02 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-02 10:16 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-02 10:53 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 13:15 ` [PATCH -next 3/3] md/raid10: prevent unnecessary calls to wake_up() in fast path Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 13:40 ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2022-08-31 11:55 ` [PATCH -next 0/3] md/raid10: reduce lock contention for io Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 13:58 ` Paul Menzel
2022-08-30 1:09 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-31 11:59 ` Paul Menzel
2022-08-31 12:07 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-31 18:00 ` Song Liu
2022-09-03 6:08 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-09 14:45 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=691f9d94-f650-0f04-2d49-74fe84c24bfe@linux.dev \
--to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox