From: "Michał Przyłuski" <mikylie@gmail.com>
To: lrhorer@satx.rr.com
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID halting
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:53:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c4602af0904250153i4dd01201j85b54aef24445a0c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090425074027510.YPAD9976@cdptpa-omta03.mail.rr.com>
2009/4/25 Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@satx.rr.com>:
> I went ahead and selected 256K. There's something a little odd, though.
> mdadm is reporting a device size of 2T. These are 1T drives. The overall
> array size is correct but the device size is goofy. I hope this doesn't
> cause any problems. As I believe I mentioned before (or maybe it was on
> another list), I once had problems with ext3 trying to read beyond the
> physical end of the array.
>
> RAID-Server:/Backup/Personal_Folders# mdadm -Dt /dev/md0
> /dev/md0:
> Version : 01.02
> Creation Time : Sat Apr 25 01:17:12 2009
> Raid Level : raid6
> Array Size : 7814098944 (7452.11 GiB 8001.64 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 1953524736 (1863.03 GiB 2000.41 GB)
It's a bug in mdadm, probably leftover from blocks/sectors migration,
I believe it was fixed in 2.6.9. The reality is looking okay, array is
safe, it's just mdadm miscalculating on the very last stage of output.
Greets,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-25 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <49D7C19C.2050308@gmail.com>
2009-04-05 0:07 ` RAID halting Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-05 0:49 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-04-05 5:34 ` Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-05 7:16 ` Richard Scobie
2009-04-05 8:22 ` Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-05 14:05 ` Drew
2009-04-05 18:54 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-05 19:17 ` John Robinson
2009-04-05 20:00 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-04-05 20:39 ` Peter Grandi
2009-04-05 23:27 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-05 22:03 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-06 22:16 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-04-07 18:22 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-24 4:52 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-24 6:50 ` Richard Scobie
2009-04-24 10:03 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-28 19:36 ` lrhorer
2009-04-24 15:24 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-25 4:26 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-24 17:03 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-24 20:25 ` Richard Scobie
2009-04-24 20:28 ` CoolCold
2009-04-24 21:04 ` Richard Scobie
2009-04-25 7:40 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-25 8:53 ` Michał Przyłuski [this message]
2009-04-28 19:33 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-29 11:25 ` John Robinson
2009-04-30 0:55 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-30 12:34 ` John Robinson
2009-05-03 2:16 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-05-03 2:23 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-24 20:25 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-04-25 7:24 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-05 21:02 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-05 19:26 ` Richard Scobie
2009-04-05 20:40 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-05 20:57 ` Peter Grandi
2009-04-05 23:55 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-06 20:35 ` jim owens
2009-04-07 17:47 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-07 18:18 ` David Lethe
2009-04-08 14:17 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-08 14:30 ` David Lethe
2009-04-09 4:52 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-09 6:45 ` David Lethe
2009-04-08 14:37 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-04-08 16:29 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-09 3:24 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-10 3:02 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-10 4:51 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-10 12:50 ` jim owens
2009-04-10 15:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-04-11 1:37 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-11 13:02 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-04-10 8:53 ` David Greaves
2009-04-08 18:04 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-07 18:20 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-04-08 8:45 ` John Robinson
2009-04-09 3:34 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-05 7:33 ` Richard Scobie
2009-04-05 0:57 ` Roger Heflin
2009-04-05 6:30 ` Lelsie Rhorer
[not found] <49F2A193.8080807@sauce.co.nz>
2009-04-25 7:03 ` Leslie Rhorer
[not found] <49F21B75.7060705@sauce.co.nz>
2009-04-25 4:32 ` Leslie Rhorer
[not found] <49D89515.3020800@computer.org>
2009-04-05 18:40 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-05 14:22 FW: " David Lethe
2009-04-05 14:53 ` David Lethe
2009-04-05 20:33 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-05 22:20 ` Peter Grandi
2009-04-06 0:31 ` Doug Ledford
2009-04-06 1:53 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-06 12:37 ` Doug Ledford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-05 5:33 David Lethe
2009-04-05 8:14 ` RAID halting Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-04 17:05 Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-02 13:35 Andrew Burgess
2009-04-04 5:57 ` RAID halting Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-04 13:01 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-04 14:39 ` Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-04 15:04 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-04 15:15 ` Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-04 16:39 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-02 7:33 Peter Grandi
2009-04-02 23:01 ` RAID halting Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-02 6:56 your mail Luca Berra
2009-04-04 6:44 ` RAID halting Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-02 4:38 Strange filesystem slowness with 8TB RAID6 NeilBrown
2009-04-04 7:12 ` RAID halting Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-04 12:38 ` Roger Heflin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c4602af0904250153i4dd01201j85b54aef24445a0c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mikylie@gmail.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrhorer@satx.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).