linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] md/raid1: Fix stack memory use after return in raid1_reshape
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 19:46:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <726fe46d-afd5-4247-86a0-14d7f0eeb3b3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a876d8f-b8d1-46c0-d969-cbabb544eb03@huaweicloud.com>

On 2025/6/12 19:23, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 在 2025/06/12 17:55, Wang Jinchao 写道:
>> Now that we have the same information, I prefer patch-v1 before 
>> refactoring raid1_reshape,
>> because it’s really simple (only one line) and clearer to show the 
>> backup and restore logic.
>> Another reason is that v2 freezes the RAID longer than v1.
>> Would you like me to provide a v3 patch combining the v2 explanation 
>> with the v1 diff?
>> Thanks for your reviewing.
> 
> I don't have preference here, feel free to do this.
> 
> BTW, I feel raid1_reshape can be better coding with following:
> 
> - covert r1bio_pool to use mempool_create_kmalloc_pool(use create
> instead of init to get rid of the werid assigment);
mempool_create_kmalloc_pool also calls init_waitqueue_head(&pool->wait) 
internally, just like mempool_init.
So the issue only exists if newpool is allocated on the stack.
> - no need to reallocate pool_info;
> - convert raid1_info to use krealloc;
I think reallocating pool_info is only for backup and restore, similar 
to newpool.
> 
> Welcome if you are willing to, otherwise I'll find myself sometime.
I'm a newcomer to RAID and can't quite catch up with it right now.
Maybe I can refactor it later, and I look forward to your guidance.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kuai
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-12 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-11  8:55 [PATCH v2] md/raid1: Fix stack memory use after return in raid1_reshape Wang Jinchao
2025-06-12  7:31 ` Yu Kuai
2025-06-12  7:45   ` Wang Jinchao
2025-06-12  9:17     ` Yu Kuai
2025-06-12  9:55       ` Wang Jinchao
2025-06-12 11:23         ` Yu Kuai
2025-06-12 11:46           ` Wang Jinchao [this message]
2025-06-12 11:58             ` Yu Kuai
2025-06-12 12:21               ` Wang Jinchao
2025-06-13  9:15                 ` Yu Kuai
2025-06-13 11:53                   ` Wang Jinchao
2025-06-16 10:11                     ` Wang Jinchao
2025-06-16 11:32                       ` Yu Kuai
2025-06-18 11:47                         ` Wang Jinchao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=726fe46d-afd5-4247-86a0-14d7f0eeb3b3@gmail.com \
    --to=wangjinchao600@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).