linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AndyLiebman@aol.com
To: jim@rubylane.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stupid Question?
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 05:33:57 EDT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77.2a3e6256.2de31b85@aol.com> (raw)


>You always need to make partitions
>with fdisk before initializing the partition with a filesystem using
>mkfs.

After creating a Hardware RAID-5 with a 3ware 8506 card -- which comes up as 
/dev/sda on my machine (my system drive is a single IDE drive, /dev/hda) -- I 
have found that I AM able to put my filesystem on the RAID without making a 
partition. 

I ask this question because I have seen some discussions about some issues 
with "blockdev" and "block sizes" and how maybe you can get better throughput on 
devices if they are "higher" up the chain. I.E., /dev/sda is higher than 
/dev/sda1 and /dev/sda2. 

I didn't see any problems "formating" or "putting a file system" on a whole 
block device like /dev/sda. I ran Bonnie++ on it without issue. (I got the same 
results as with /dev/sda1 -- but I'm now looking into what I've been reading 
about blockdev and doing some tuning). But maybe I'm missing some. I'm NOT 
booting from the RAID. It's just for data storage. 

By the way, for those with 3ware 8506 cards, at the suggestion of 3ware I 
tuned the readahead value on my RAID with 'blockdev --setra 16384 /dev/sdX' 
(actually they had recommended this for their forthcoming 9500 series) and my read 
results with Bonnie++ jumped from 100 to 200 MB/sec on a 8-drive SATA RAID-5 
array. I don't yet know how the tuning will affect real world results. 

Might similar tuning make any difference for Software RAID-5 (I already get 
175 MB/sec using the same 3ware card in its JBOD mode). 

Andy Liebman

             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-24  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-24  9:33 AndyLiebman [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-23 21:52 Stupid Question? AndyLiebman
2004-05-23 23:23 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2004-05-24  2:01 ` jim
2004-05-24  2:33   ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77.2a3e6256.2de31b85@aol.com \
    --to=andyliebman@aol.com \
    --cc=jim@rubylane.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).