linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* raid10 physical layout?
@ 2013-05-24 18:49 Matt Garman
  2013-05-24 19:13 ` Phil Turmel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matt Garman @ 2013-05-24 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid


I'm looking into building a six-disk raid10.  The six disks are
comprised of three from one manufacturer, and three from another.

My intuition says that for better statistical reliability, the
redundant data copies ought to fall on disks of different
manufacturers.  I know I could achieve this easily by building a
"classic" RAID1+0 system: three RAID-1 sets built by
manufacturerA+manufacturerB pairs, then striping those mirrored sets
in RAID-0.

But based on what I've been reading, looks like mdadm's more
sophisticated raid10 layout schemes give better performance.  For
example, can I create a raid10,f2 set in such a way as to meet my
"redundant copies on different manufacturer" criteria?

Thanks,
Matt


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-25 13:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-24 18:49 raid10 physical layout? Matt Garman
2013-05-24 19:13 ` Phil Turmel
2013-05-25 13:31   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).