From: Christopher Chen <muffaleta@gmail.com>
To: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID without superblock
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:17:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bc80d500904201117r60353fa1ped1d64a50da87bc0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090420181045.GA4236@lazy.lzy>
I don't think it's a problem anymore, but on Centos 5.2, use of
superblocks other than 0.90 and sparegroups with md monitor are not
compatible. I found this out the hard way after creating a few arrays
with 1.2 and putting them in the same sparegroup--when one array went
degraded, mdadm removed the spare from one, but failed when trying to
add it to the other, leaving me one spare less and with a degraded
array still.
Fun!
Cheers
cc
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Piergiorgio Sartor
<piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all thanks a lot for all the suggestions,
> it is really nice to have this support!
>
> While reading the answers, I realized that I did
> not make the "requirements" really clear. My bad.
>
> The "primary" disk is an external one, which 90%
> of the time is connected to the same Linux PC.
> But, it could happen it is removed and connected
> somewhere else, where no "md" is available.
>
> My idea was, in order to have some protection, to
> use it in RAID-1 "superblockless" configuration
> on the "default" PC, and use it as a normal disk
> whenever (or wherever) necessary.
> Of course, the bitmap resync will not work, when
> updating the disk directly, without "md" layer.
>
> On the other hand, if the full-resync is always
> done from this disk to the local mirror, there
> would be no problem, except time.
>
> The reason to do this kind of backup is that this
> disk is encrypted, so a "block device copy" will
> keep the data encrypted, while a backup of the
> mounted disk will not. Unless done to another
> encrypted disk/partition, of course.
>
> Clearly, any suggestion is still really appreciated!
>
> Thanks again,
>
> bye,
>
> --
>
> piergiorgio
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Chris Chen <muffaleta@gmail.com>
"I want the kind of six pack you can't drink."
-- Micah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-20 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-19 11:47 RAID without superblock Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-19 20:44 ` NeilBrown
2009-04-19 21:04 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-19 21:57 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-04-20 18:10 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2009-04-20 18:17 ` Christopher Chen [this message]
2009-04-19 23:33 ` John Robinson
2009-04-20 5:13 ` Tapani Tarvainen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7bc80d500904201117r60353fa1ped1d64a50da87bc0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=muffaleta@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).