From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: mdadm segfault with incremental Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:00:10 +1100 Message-ID: <871slqevmd.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> References: <87mv4iehop.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rnar?= Ness Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 24 2017, Bj=C3=B8rnar Ness wrote: > Hello, Neil. > > This patch seems to solve the issues I am experiencing. So fine to apply. > Thanks for testing and confirming. I'll turn it into a proper patch and send it upstream. There might be other places where validate_geometry should be used instead of avail_size. Thanks, NeilBrown --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEG8Yp69OQ2HB7X0l6Oeye3VZigbkFAlnxCWsACgkQOeye3VZi gblFqw//XfVfBlHUlgLURsnQ9VbiiXcOxZO2V/cG695FLVvGmRomOjp5fdA/P9nG kvEkL5i9i/UZFPqeoJ/qUd31GKNxuYkLhKYchen4dH//PkewiaKX4IGHiUq/lo/D lA855tTxivB1m5NKSoNLfY6nJz4Z4lrGvMPdZYz6W5pc4qFwhCkkMPbNUZy5xTUw W/mEwEQW7RqANx7bKJwQ8scy4pFMRbOCI7d+I07tPLCzmx7FxikdUuujLN6HAcwB FhHS9ok/jnkjaoU7ZjnYhwjAVEkldhbp/Ed3E90qJuUn2GmFbYLLqWxtPEB/o0+q tJtccb1IlX/z03iz1LQ0s0VKgIHS28sHFY5dj4B02UhtaYGeH8956d5ZuhAzAgPZ 5N+ccwwyw9h/1L2b4MU6NfuOOL3+l8sjjNzhUWVwYWk3BLUilywfsb9wFlyCI0AD elMgx5W3eGuYG7nTQ0C54JGMX7W49V/M4u/K8yXWQPYa00VBVIxSktK+ydP7wM9y p19td3xId5HKmAF71Y8F70pdyKr6QFBrJmuZjHvdzvirgYT1C9JPOV7QAebiofca TUcDIJOZb0Q63UN66Oi8mCbb5YVRGSfM4koZp4IKCCQ+DUea/3AZwgI1rGXB0yA2 8+3G3vq1KJ34ZgFkDcqF3audLHtLdObC6Svmteh/paCGWR2D+sQ= =DWNs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--