From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>, Zhilong Liu <zlliu@suse.com>,
Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mdadm: one question about the readonly and readwrite feature
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:42:38 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871stobqvl.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58D32AE2.1030303@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2965 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 23 2017, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> On 03/23/2017 05:55 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22 2017, Zhilong Liu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Neil;
>>>
>>> Excuse me, according to read 'mdadm/tests/ToTest', I'm a little
>>> confused about "readonly"
>>> and "readwrite" feature, and I've no idea how to fix it. Thus I report
>>> this question and I'm sorry
>>> for this long description email.
>>>
>>> relevant linux/driver/md commit: 260fa034ef7a4ff8b73068b48ac497edd5217491
>>>
>>> My question: If the array has been set the MD_CLOSING flag, although
>>> hasn't removed the sysfs
>>> folder because sysfs_remove_group() wasn't invoked, and now, how should
>>> mdadm continue to
>>> control this 'readonly' array?
>> MD_CLOSING should only be set for a short period or time to avoid
>> certain races. After the operation that set it completes, it should be
>> cleared.
>> It looks like this is a bug that was introduced in
>> Commit: af8d8e6f0315 ("md: changes for MD_STILL_CLOSED flag")
>> when MD_STILL_CLOSED was renamed to MD_CLOSING.
>
> I guess it is because we set MD_CLOSING for STOP_ARRAY_RO cmd, then commit
> af8d8e6f0315 ("md: changes for MD_STILL_CLOSED flag") did below changes:
>
> @@ -7075,9 +7073,13 @@ static int md_open(struct block_device *bdev,
> fmode_t mode)
> if ((err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&mddev->open_mutex)))
> goto out;
>
> + if (test_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&mddev->open_mutex);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
>
> Maybe we need to differentiate "STOP_ARRAY" and "STOP_ARRAY_RO", or
> revert above
> changes.
>
No, your missing the point.
What you describe above would change the effect of what MD_CLOSING does.
We don't want to change it. It is good.
The problem is that when it has finished doing what it needs to do,
we aren't clearing it. That is simply a bug.
So something like this is needed.
NeilBrown
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 7e168ff1ae90..567aba246497 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -6934,6 +6934,7 @@ static int md_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
struct mddev *mddev = NULL;
int ro;
+ bool did_set_md_closing = false;
if (!md_ioctl_valid(cmd))
return -ENOTTY;
@@ -7023,7 +7024,9 @@ static int md_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
err = -EBUSY;
goto out;
}
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags));
set_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags);
+ did_set_md_closing = true;
mutex_unlock(&mddev->open_mutex);
sync_blockdev(bdev);
}
@@ -7216,6 +7219,8 @@ static int md_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
mddev->hold_active = 0;
mddev_unlock(mddev);
out:
+ if (did_set_md_closing)
+ clear_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags);
return err;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 12:00 mdadm: one question about the readonly and readwrite feature Zhilong Liu
2017-03-22 21:55 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-23 1:54 ` Guoqing Jiang
2017-03-23 2:26 ` Guoqing Jiang
2017-03-23 3:42 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-03-23 3:54 ` Zhilong Liu
2017-03-23 6:50 ` Zhilong Liu
2017-03-23 7:06 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-23 8:14 ` Zhilong Liu
2017-03-24 0:28 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-24 15:44 ` Zhilong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871stobqvl.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=gqjiang@suse.com \
--cc=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlliu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).