* [PATCH 1/2] raid5-cache: destroy mempool
@ 2016-01-05 0:43 Shaohua Li
2016-01-05 0:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] raid5-cache: correctly handle stripe with enough journal space Shaohua Li
2016-01-06 1:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] raid5-cache: destroy mempool NeilBrown
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2016-01-05 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid; +Cc: neilb
io_unit mempool isn't destroied with recent changes.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index d992d62..55a905e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -1257,6 +1257,7 @@ void r5l_exit_log(struct r5l_log *log)
md_unregister_thread(&log->reclaim_thread);
mempool_destroy(log->meta_pool);
bioset_free(log->bs);
+ mempool_destroy(log->io_pool);
kmem_cache_destroy(log->io_kc);
kfree(log);
}
--
2.4.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] raid5-cache: correctly handle stripe with enough journal space
2016-01-05 0:43 [PATCH 1/2] raid5-cache: destroy mempool Shaohua Li
@ 2016-01-05 0:43 ` Shaohua Li
2016-01-06 1:54 ` NeilBrown
2016-01-06 1:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] raid5-cache: destroy mempool NeilBrown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2016-01-05 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid; +Cc: neilb
If there are spaces in journal, we do nothing. Likely a typo merging
recent io_unit mempool patch.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index 55a905e..d242a36 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -494,19 +494,19 @@ int r5l_write_stripe(struct r5l_log *log, struct stripe_head *sh)
mutex_lock(&log->io_mutex);
/* meta + data */
reserve = (1 + write_disks) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
- if (!r5l_has_free_space(log, reserve)) {
- spin_lock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
- list_add_tail(&sh->log_list, &log->no_space_stripes);
- spin_unlock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
-
- r5l_wake_reclaim(log, reserve);
-
+ if (r5l_has_free_space(log, reserve)) {
ret = r5l_log_stripe(log, sh, data_pages, parity_pages);
if (ret) {
spin_lock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
list_add_tail(&sh->log_list, &log->no_mem_stripes);
spin_unlock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
}
+ } else {
+ spin_lock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&sh->log_list, &log->no_space_stripes);
+ spin_unlock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
+
+ r5l_wake_reclaim(log, reserve);
}
mutex_unlock(&log->io_mutex);
--
2.4.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] raid5-cache: destroy mempool
2016-01-05 0:43 [PATCH 1/2] raid5-cache: destroy mempool Shaohua Li
2016-01-05 0:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] raid5-cache: correctly handle stripe with enough journal space Shaohua Li
@ 2016-01-06 1:50 ` NeilBrown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2016-01-06 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shaohua Li, linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 05 2016, Shaohua Li wrote:
> io_unit mempool isn't destroied with recent changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> index d992d62..55a905e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> @@ -1257,6 +1257,7 @@ void r5l_exit_log(struct r5l_log *log)
> md_unregister_thread(&log->reclaim_thread);
> mempool_destroy(log->meta_pool);
> bioset_free(log->bs);
> + mempool_destroy(log->io_pool);
> kmem_cache_destroy(log->io_kc);
> kfree(log);
> }
Thanks!
I've merge that into the offending patch rather than adding it as a
separate patch.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] raid5-cache: correctly handle stripe with enough journal space
2016-01-05 0:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] raid5-cache: correctly handle stripe with enough journal space Shaohua Li
@ 2016-01-06 1:54 ` NeilBrown
2016-01-06 1:55 ` Shaohua Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2016-01-06 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shaohua Li, linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2327 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 05 2016, Shaohua Li wrote:
> If there are spaces in journal, we do nothing. Likely a typo merging
> recent io_unit mempool patch.
Very likely.
I think the same effect as your patch can be achieved with
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index 55a905e56e8a..6d2b4789a928 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ int r5l_write_stripe(struct r5l_log *log, struct stripe_head *sh)
spin_unlock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
r5l_wake_reclaim(log, reserve);
-
+ } else {
ret = r5l_log_stripe(log, sh, data_pages, parity_pages);
if (ret) {
spin_lock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
Are you OK with me just merging that into the offending patch?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> index 55a905e..d242a36 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> @@ -494,19 +494,19 @@ int r5l_write_stripe(struct r5l_log *log, struct stripe_head *sh)
> mutex_lock(&log->io_mutex);
> /* meta + data */
> reserve = (1 + write_disks) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
> - if (!r5l_has_free_space(log, reserve)) {
> - spin_lock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
> - list_add_tail(&sh->log_list, &log->no_space_stripes);
> - spin_unlock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
> -
> - r5l_wake_reclaim(log, reserve);
> -
> + if (r5l_has_free_space(log, reserve)) {
> ret = r5l_log_stripe(log, sh, data_pages, parity_pages);
> if (ret) {
> spin_lock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
> list_add_tail(&sh->log_list, &log->no_mem_stripes);
> spin_unlock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
> }
> + } else {
> + spin_lock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
> + list_add_tail(&sh->log_list, &log->no_space_stripes);
> + spin_unlock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
> +
> + r5l_wake_reclaim(log, reserve);
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&log->io_mutex);
> --
> 2.4.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] raid5-cache: correctly handle stripe with enough journal space
2016-01-06 1:54 ` NeilBrown
@ 2016-01-06 1:55 ` Shaohua Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2016-01-06 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NeilBrown; +Cc: linux-raid
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:54:28PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05 2016, Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> > If there are spaces in journal, we do nothing. Likely a typo merging
> > recent io_unit mempool patch.
>
> Very likely.
>
> I think the same effect as your patch can be achieved with
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> index 55a905e56e8a..6d2b4789a928 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ int r5l_write_stripe(struct r5l_log *log, struct stripe_head *sh)
> spin_unlock(&log->no_space_stripes_lock);
>
> r5l_wake_reclaim(log, reserve);
> -
> + } else {
> ret = r5l_log_stripe(log, sh, data_pages, parity_pages);
> if (ret) {
> spin_lock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
>
> Are you OK with me just merging that into the offending patch?
sure, please go ahead
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-06 1:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-01-05 0:43 [PATCH 1/2] raid5-cache: destroy mempool Shaohua Li
2016-01-05 0:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] raid5-cache: correctly handle stripe with enough journal space Shaohua Li
2016-01-06 1:54 ` NeilBrown
2016-01-06 1:55 ` Shaohua Li
2016-01-06 1:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] raid5-cache: destroy mempool NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).