From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tobias DiPasquale <codeslinger@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: raid 10 or 1+0 ?
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:26:21 -0400
Message-ID: <876ef97a05042304262d0b5c3a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d4avg1$pge$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: Tobias DiPasquale <codeslinger@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <d4avg1$pge$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: yves DEGLAIN <admin@avallon.be>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On 4/22/05, yves DEGLAIN <admin@avallon.be> wrote:
> is raid 10 work like a raid 1+0  and witch one is the more stable/sure
> to boot on it as root fs ?

I believe that RAID 10 == RAID 1+0. They are just two notations for
the same thing. Thus, either would be equally suitable.

-- 
[ Tobias DiPasquale ]
0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d