From: Phillip Susi <phill@thesusis.net>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Cc: d tbsky <tbskyd@gmail.com>, Linux Raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: raid10 redundancy
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 11:38:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6oyr64b.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2140221131.2872520.1620837067395.JavaMail.zimbra@karlsbakk.net>
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk writes:
> Basically, the reason to use raid10 over raid6 is to increase
> performance. This is particularly important regarding rebuild
> times. If you have a huge raid-6 array with large drives, it'll take a
> long time to rebuild it after a disk fails. With raid10, this is far
> lower, since you don't need to rewrite and compute so
> much. Personally, I'd choose raid6 over raid10 in most setups unless I
How do you figure that? Sure, raid6 is going to use more CPU time but
that isn't going to be a bottleneck unless you are using some blazing
fast NVME drives. Certainly with HDD the rebuild time is simply how
long it takes to write all of the data to the new disk, so it's going to
be the same either way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-13 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 5:09 raid10 redundancy d tbsky
2021-05-06 7:48 ` Xiao Ni
2021-05-06 9:57 ` d tbsky
2021-05-06 12:38 ` Reindl Harald
2021-05-07 1:28 ` d tbsky
2021-05-08 13:47 ` keld
2021-05-09 0:52 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-12 17:22 ` David T-G
2021-05-12 17:26 ` Reindl Harald
2021-05-12 17:39 ` David T-G
2021-05-13 15:38 ` Andy Smith
2021-05-13 15:46 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-13 15:59 ` Andy Smith
2021-05-14 14:28 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-14 14:37 ` Andy Smith
2021-05-17 2:07 ` Brad Campbell
2021-05-06 13:09 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-07 1:47 ` d tbsky
[not found] ` <86A76859-3098-4AB8-9AE7-46FF54736B88@websitemanagers.com.au>
2021-05-07 3:05 ` d tbsky
2021-05-07 3:26 ` Reindl Harald
2021-05-07 14:53 ` Andy Smith
2021-05-08 1:54 ` d tbsky
2021-05-08 5:55 ` Andy Smith
2021-05-09 1:10 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-07 1:26 ` d tbsky
2021-05-06 10:39 ` Peter Grandi
2021-05-07 1:37 ` d tbsky
[not found] ` <AD8C004B-FE83-4ABD-B58A-1F7F8683CD1F@websitemanagers.com.au>
2021-05-07 1:12 ` d tbsky
2021-05-07 9:46 ` Wols Lists
2021-05-11 0:04 ` Phil Turmel
2021-05-12 17:27 ` David T-G
2021-05-12 18:20 ` Phil Turmel
2021-05-12 16:31 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2021-05-13 15:38 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2021-05-13 18:21 ` Phil Turmel
2021-05-14 14:30 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-14 14:48 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2021-05-17 20:50 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-17 22:21 ` Wols Lists
2021-05-18 0:12 ` Phil Turmel
2021-05-18 16:05 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-18 17:38 ` Reindl Harald
2021-05-18 18:51 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-18 19:02 ` Reindl Harald
2021-05-18 23:48 ` antlists
2021-05-19 3:42 ` Adam Goryachev
2021-05-19 13:02 ` Phillip Susi
2021-05-19 21:19 ` Reindl Harald
2021-05-20 1:32 ` Adam Goryachev
[not found] ` <CAAMCDeeOnraMDNCF6ZZqPAxUrih2gSse1wDYgOfd1LqY-Ffqxw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-05-20 15:08 ` antlists
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6oyr64b.fsf@vps.thesusis.net \
--to=phill@thesusis.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=tbskyd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox