From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: REALLY Fix bug in [md PATCH 02/15] md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata is updated.
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:35:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a88eavi3.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87inn2avsj.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 595 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 22 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> Using r1_bio->sector in call_bio_endio is more
> obviously-correct than bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> though both should have the same value.
>
> The inc_pending() call in handle_read_error() was missing.
> One should always accompany a bio_inc_remaining.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> ---
>
> Sorry, I left an unused variable...
> NeilBrown
Sorry again - I replied to the wrong email (not a good day...)
and gave the wrong subject.
This should be
REALLY Fix bugs in [md PATCH 10/15] md/raid1: stop using bi_phys_segment
:-(
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 3:05 [md PATCH 00/15 v2] remove all abuse of bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 04/15] block: trace completion of all bios NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 01/15] md/raid5: use md_write_start to count stripes, not bios NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 02/15] md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata is updated NeilBrown
2017-03-15 23:03 ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16 2:45 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-22 1:40 ` Fix bug in " NeilBrown
2017-03-22 2:29 ` REALLY " NeilBrown
2017-03-22 2:35 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-03-23 2:22 ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 03/15] md/raid5: call bio_endio() directly rather than queueing for later NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 08/15] md/raid1, raid10: move rXbio accounting closer to allocation NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 09/15] md/raid10: stop using bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 06/15] md/raid5: remove over-loading of ->bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 07/15] Revert "md/raid5: limit request size according to implementation limits" NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 05/15] md/raid5: use bio_inc_remaining() instead of repurposing bi_phys_segments as a counter NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 12/15] md: factor out set_in_sync() NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 10/15] md/raid1: stop using bi_phys_segment NeilBrown
2017-03-16 0:13 ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16 2:49 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-16 3:36 ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-22 1:41 ` Fix bugs in " NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 13/15] md: close a race with setting mddev->in_sync NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 15/15] MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending NeilBrown
2017-03-16 1:05 ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16 2:57 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-22 1:55 ` Improvement for " NeilBrown
2017-03-22 2:34 ` IMPROVEMENT for " NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 11/15] md/raid5: don't test ->writes_pending in raid5_remove_disk NeilBrown
2017-03-15 3:05 ` [md PATCH 14/15] percpu-refcount: support synchronous switch to atomic mode NeilBrown
2017-03-16 1:12 ` [md PATCH 00/15 v2] remove all abuse of bi_phys_segments Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a88eavi3.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).