linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Requesting replace mode for changing a disk
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:22:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ab5lycnh.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A060CBE.9090308@tmr.com> (Bill Davidsen's message of "Sat, 09 May 2009 19:07:42 -0400")

Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> writes:

> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> consider the following situation: You have a software raid that runs
>> fine but one disk is suspect (e.g. SMART says failure imminent or
>> something). How do you replace that disk?
>>
>> Currently you have do fail/remove the disk from the raid, add a
>> fresh disk and resync. That leaves a large window in which redundancy
>> is compromised. With current disk sizes that can be days.
>>
>> It would be nice if one could tell the kernel to replace a disk in a
>> raid set with a spare without the need to degrade the raid.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> This is one of many things proposed occasionally here, no real
> objection, sometimes loud support, but no one actually *does* the code.
>
> You have described the problem exactly, and the solution is still to
> do it manually. But you don't need to fail the drive long term, if you
> can stop the array for a few moments. You stop the array, remove the
> suspect drive, create a raid1 of the suspect drive marked write-mostly
> and the new spare, then add the raid1 in place of the suspect
> drive. For any chunks present on the new drive the reads will go
> there, reducing access, while data is copied from the old to the new
> in resync, and writes still go to the old suspect drive so if the new
> drive fails you are no worse off. When the raid1 is clean you stop the
> main array and back the suspect drive out.
>
> This is complicated enough that I totally agree a hot migrate would be
> desirable. This is why people use lvm, although I make zero claims
> that this same problem will solve more easily, I'm just not an lvm
> guru (or even a newbie, just an occasional user).

The difference, appart from simpler usage, would be that the raid does
not have to be stoped. Stopping the raid that contains / or /usr means
some downtime.

In the case of LVM there is the fact that you can suspend a
device-mapper device and alter its mapping any way you wish. So you
can do things manually without umounting the filesystems. But lvm /
device-mapper doesn't have all the raid stuff so one can't just
switch.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-10  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-08 22:15 Requesting replace mode for changing a disk Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-09 11:41 ` John Robinson
2009-05-09 23:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-10  1:22   ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2009-05-10  2:20   ` Guy Watkins
2009-05-10  7:02     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-10 14:33     ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-10 15:55       ` Guy Watkins
2009-05-13  1:21   ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-05-13  3:27     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-13  4:36       ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  7:37         ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-13 11:02           ` Neil Brown
2009-05-14 10:44         ` David Greaves
2009-05-14 12:00           ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  4:31     ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  4:37       ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-13  4:54         ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  5:07           ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-13  5:21             ` NeilBrown
2009-05-13  5:31               ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-13 10:51                 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  7:28       ` Goswin von Brederlow
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-13  4:08 Sandeep K Sinha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ab5lycnh.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
    --to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).