From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Greg Freemyer" Subject: Re: WD GreenPower & Load_Cycle_Count Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:52:45 -0500 Message-ID: <87f94c370812232052v7280acf5vc26bb4bb4e6abffa@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081223145334.GA17496@sewage.raw-sewage.fake> <72dbd3150812231114u3a310eccm5b35309b9910170c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <72dbd3150812231114u3a310eccm5b35309b9910170c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Rees , Matt Garman , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Google for storage-fixup. Iirc, tejun heo has a webpage dedicated to the problem. On 12/23/08, David Rees wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Matt Garman > wrote: >> The gist is that if you look at the SMART attributes on these >> drives, chances are you'll see a really high Load_Cycle_Count. I do >> for my WD GP drives. > > FWIW, the two WD5000AACS drives I just bought don't exhibit this > behavior. After 20 days of operation, they are only showing 9-10 load > cycles. > > -Dave > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Sent from my mobile device Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com